首页> 外文期刊>Communication studies >Mediation or Moderation? Examining How Politically Like-Minded and Dissimilar Conversations Influence the Relationship Between Social Media Political Information Consumption and Political Participation
【24h】

Mediation or Moderation? Examining How Politically Like-Minded and Dissimilar Conversations Influence the Relationship Between Social Media Political Information Consumption and Political Participation

机译:调解还是节制?研究政治上志趣相投的对话如何影响社交媒体政治信息消费与政治参与之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research has shown that social media conversations with like-minded and politically dissimilar others are an important part of the political process. Yet more needs to be done to clarify the roles that these two types of social media-based conversations play in the political process. A stratified quota online survey was used to determine whether politically like-minded and dissimilar conversations mediate or moderate the relationship between social media-based political information consumption and political participation. Findings show support for the mediating, but not moderating role of politically based social media conversations. Social media political information consumption has a positive indirect relationship with political participation via both politically like-minded and dissimilar conversations. Contrary to previous research showing that politically dissimilar conversations impede political participation, results suggest that such conversations actually increase political participation. Implications of these findings are discussed.
机译:研究表明,社交媒体与志趣相投且政治上互不相同的其他人的对话是政治进程的重要组成部分。还需要做更多的工作来阐明这两种基于社交媒体的对话在政治进程中的作用。使用分层配额在线调查来确定政治上志趣相投的对话是否介导或调节基于社交媒体的政治信息消费与政治参与之间的关系。调查结果显示了对进行调解的支持,但并未减弱基于政治的社交媒体对话的作用。社交媒体的政治信息消费通过政治上志同道合的对话和政治对话与政治参与有着积极的间接关系。与先前的研究表明政治上不同的对话会阻碍政治参与相反,结果表明此类对话实际上增加了政治参与。讨论了这些发现的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号