首页> 外文期刊>Communication Law and Policy >Behind the U.S. Reports: Justice Brennan's Unpublished Opinions and Memoranda in New York Times v. Sullivan and Its Progeny
【24h】

Behind the U.S. Reports: Justice Brennan's Unpublished Opinions and Memoranda in New York Times v. Sullivan and Its Progeny

机译:美国报道的背后:《纽约时报》诉沙利文及其后代的布伦南法官未发表的意见和备忘录

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The contributions Justice William J. Brennan Jr. made to free expression in general and the law of libel in particular are unquestioned. His opinion in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and cases that followed established sturdy protection for critics of public officials and helped further the marketplace of ideas that is so important for public discourse. Justice Brennan wrote thousands of words about Sullivan and its impact that never appeared in published opinions, however. Often he was required to alter his writings to accommodate the views of other justices needed for a majority. Those unpublished opinions - and memoranda he wrote - may more accurately reflect his real vision of the First Amendment than what appeared in his published opinions. This essay examines those unpublished writings in an effort to determine that vision.
机译:毫无疑问,小威廉·布伦南大法官为言论自由,特别是诽谤法做出了贡献。他在《纽约时报诉沙利文诉纽约时报》及其后的案例中为公职人员的批评者建立了牢固的保护,并有助于进一步发展对公众话语至关重要的思想市场。布伦南法官撰写了数千篇有关沙利文及其影响的文字,但从未发表过。通常,他被要求更改其著作,以适应多数法官所需要的其他法官的观点。那些未发表的意见和他写的备忘录可能比他发表的意见更准确地反映了他对《第一修正案》的真实见解。本文研究了那些未发表的著作,以期确定这一愿景。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Communication Law and Policy》 |2014年第2期|227-261|共35页
  • 作者

    Lee Levine; Stephen Wermiel;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University Law Center and partner, Levine, Sullivan, Koch & Schulz, LLP;

    American University Washington College of Law;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:13:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号