首页> 外文期刊>Communication Law and Policy >Measuring Reed's Reach: Content Discrimination in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals After Reed v. Town of Gilbert
【24h】

Measuring Reed's Reach: Content Discrimination in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals After Reed v. Town of Gilbert

机译:测量芦苇的范围:在芦苇之后美国电路法院的内容歧视。吉尔伯特镇

获取原文
       

摘要

Commentators and justices on the Supreme Court of the United States speculated when the Court delivered its opinion in Reed v. Town of Gilbert in 2015 that the case would dramatically reshape First Amendment law. This article analyzes Reed's impact to date in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals. The article demonstrates that, although Reed has been consequential in some circuits, it has not been the basis of any First Amendment revolution. Indeed, the research supports the conclusion that many circuit courts seem to be actively working to narrow Reed's reach. Moreover, the article concludes that Reed did little to clarify - and in some ways made worse - what has been a problematic doctrine for decades. 10.1080/10811680.2019.1586406.
机译:在法院在芦苇诉中发表意见的评论家和法官推测了美国的意见。吉尔伯特镇2015年,案件将大大重塑第一修正案法。本文分析了雷德迄今为止在美国电路法院的上诉法庭的影响。本文表明,虽然雷德在某些电路方面是后果,但它并未成为任何第一次修正革命的基础。实际上,该研究支持结论,许多电路法院似乎积极努力缩小芦苇的范围。此外,这篇文章的结论是,芦苇几乎没有澄清 - 以某种方式制定了更糟 - 几十年来的问题是有问题的教义。 10.1080 / 10811680.2019.1586406。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Communication Law and Policy》 |2019年第2期|191-270|共80页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Communication Saint Louis University;

    Department of Media Film and Journalism Studies University of Denver;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号