...
首页> 外文期刊>Combustion and Flame >Analysis of 3D combustion measurements using CH-based tomographic VLIF (volumetric laser induced fluorescence)
【24h】

Analysis of 3D combustion measurements using CH-based tomographic VLIF (volumetric laser induced fluorescence)

机译:使用基于CH的断层扫描VLIF(体积激光诱导荧光)进行3D燃烧测量分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recent results have experimentally demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining 3D (three-dimensional) combustion measurements using tomographic VLIF (volumetric laser-induced fluorescence), specifically of the CH radical, representing the flame surface. To elucidate the fundamental capabilities and limitations of the VLIF technique, this work reports an analysis of its performance in terms of signal level, size of the field of view (FOV) in 3D, and accuracy. Compared to the established PLIF (planar LIF) technique that uses a thin laser sheet to excite the target species in a plane, the VLIF technique uses a thick laser slab to excite the target species in a volume. As a result, the VLIF technique involves more performance metrics compared to PLIF, and the relationship between these metrics is also different from that in the PLIF technique. Therefore, both experimental and computational studies were conducted to analyze the performance metrics of VLIF. First, experiments were conducted on well-controlled flames to examine the relationship among excitation energy, signal level, and FOV in 3D. Second, based on these experimental data, numerical simulations were performed to benchmark the VLIF technique under a range of conditions. These results illustrate the relationship among signal level, 3D FOV, and accuracy and are expected to be valuable for the optimal design of the VLIF technique. (C) 2017 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:最近的结果通过实验证明了使用X线断层扫描VLIF(体积激光诱导的荧光),特别是代表火焰表面的CH自由基进行3D(三维)燃烧测量的可行性。为了阐明VLIF技术的基本功能和局限性,该工作报告了其在信号水平,3D视场大小(FOV)以及准确性方面的性能分析。与已建立的PLIF(平面LIF)技术相比,VLIF技术使用厚的激光平板来激发一定体积的目标物种,而PLIF(平面LIF)技术使用薄激光片在平面上激发目标物种。结果,与PLIF相比,VLIF技术涉及更多的性能指标,并且这些指标之间的关系也与PLIF技术不同。因此,进行了实验和计算研究,以分析VLIF的性能指标。首先,在控制良好的火焰上进行实验,以检查3D激发能量,信号水平和FOV之间的关系。其次,基于这些实验数据,进行了数值模拟,以在一定条件下对VLIF技术进行基准测试。这些结果说明了信号电平,3D FOV和准确性之间的关系,并有望对VLIF技术的最佳设计有价值。 (C)2017燃烧研究所。由Elsevier Inc.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Combustion and Flame》 |2017年第8期|179-189|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Virginia Tech, Dept Aerosp & Ocean Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA;

    Air Force Res Lab, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA;

    Air Force Res Lab, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA;

    Virginia Tech, Dept Aerosp & Ocean Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA|Virginia Tech, Dept Mech Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Volumetric laser induced fluorescence; Tomography;

    机译:体积激光诱导荧光;层析成像;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号