...
首页> 外文期刊>Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy >Federal Power Act Limitations on FERC Dam Decommissioning Authority: Shielding Preexisting Licensees and Revisiting Trust Funds to Protect the Public Interest
【24h】

Federal Power Act Limitations on FERC Dam Decommissioning Authority: Shielding Preexisting Licensees and Revisiting Trust Funds to Protect the Public Interest

机译:联邦电力法对FERC大坝退役管理局的限制:屏蔽既有的被许可人并重新访问信托基金以保护公众利益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When the validity of an agency interpretation is challenged and judicial scrutiny is brought to bear, a reviewing court must first determine through which lens to view the issue(s) before it. Although the Decommissioning Policy Statement is entitled to some judicial respect in light of its persuasiveness, courts and scholars alike have used the wrong standard in reaching that conclusion. Skidmore applies, not Chevron. No matter how much FERC may wish it, the Agency cannot impose millions of dollars in decommissioning costs on preexisting licensees when the licensees never agreed to take on that burden. FERC's authority as to decommissioning is limited to individuals seeking new licenses and, as a result, it cannot force current licensees to assume that responsibility. Neither can Congress, for that matter. If the Chevron standard had actually applied, the Decommissioning Policy Statement would be struck down as per se unreasonable because specific portions run into direct conflict with the unambiguous language of the Federal Power Act. Luckily, Skidmore operates here as a white knight for the Agency, allowing a court to validate that FERC does in fact possess some decommissioning authority but withholding approval of the Agency's attempt to overstep. In order to dispel any confusion as to the extent of FERC authority, Congress should amend the Federal Power Act to expressly create decommissioning authority. And, although FERC cannot pass along the costs to current licensees of hydroelectric dams, the Federal Power Act in its current form provides authority for FERC to impose these costs on future license holders. Thus, FERC should take the following two actions. First, amend its licenses to include the contractual provisions that would create licensee decommissioning-cost responsibility. Second, include a contractual provision establishing individual trust funds that would require hydropower licensees to either prepay the estimated costs of complete decommissioning or provide for a plan to charge customers and have those funds placed in a trust account.
机译:当对代理机构解释的有效性提出质疑并接受司法审查时,复审法院必须首先确定通过哪个视角审视问题。尽管《退役政策声明》因其说服力而享有某种司法尊重,但法院和学者都在得出该结论时使用了错误的标准。斯基德莫尔适用,雪佛龙不适用。不论FERC希望多少,当被许可人从未同意承担该负担时,原子能机构都不能对已存在的被许可人施加数百万美元的退役费用。 FERC的退役权力仅限于寻求新许可证的个人,因此,它不能强迫当前的许可证持有者承担这一责任。就此而言,国会也不能。如果雪佛龙标准确实适用,则退役政策声明本身就被认为是不合理的,因为某些特定部分与《联邦权力法》的明确措辞直接冲突。幸运的是,斯基德莫尔(Skidmore)在这里是美国原子能机构的白马骑士,它使法院能够确认FERC实际上确实拥有退役权力,但拒绝批准原子能机构的越级尝试。为了消除对FERC授权范围的任何混淆,国会应修改《联邦权力法》,明确建立退役授权。而且,尽管FERC无法将费用转嫁给当前的水力发电大坝许可证持有者,但目前形式的《联邦电力法》​​为FERC赋予了将这些费用强加给未来许可证持有者的权力。因此,FERC应该采取以下两项行动。首先,修改其许可证以包括将导致被许可方退役成本责任的合同条款。其次,包括一项合同条款,建立个人信托基金,这将要求水电执照持有者预付完全退役的估计费用,或者提供向客户收取费用的计划,并将这些资金存入信托账户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号