首页> 外文期刊>Cold War History >Soviet policy in the developing world and the Chinese challenge in the 1960s Jeremy Friedman was born in Brooklyn, New York in 1982. He completed his BA in history and philosophy at Stanford in 2004 and his MA in history at Princeton in 2006. He is currently working on a dissertation project entitled ‘Reviving Revolution: the Sino-Soviet Split, the ‘Third World’, and the Fate of the Left’ . View all notes
【24h】

Soviet policy in the developing world and the Chinese challenge in the 1960s Jeremy Friedman was born in Brooklyn, New York in 1982. He completed his BA in history and philosophy at Stanford in 2004 and his MA in history at Princeton in 2006. He is currently working on a dissertation project entitled ‘Reviving Revolution: the Sino-Soviet Split, the ‘Third World’, and the Fate of the Left’ . View all notes

机译:苏联在发展中国家的政策和1960年代的中国挑战杰里米·弗里德曼(Jeremy Friedman)于1982年出生于纽约布鲁克林。他于2004年在斯坦福大学获得历史和哲学学士学位,并于2006年在普林斯顿获得历史文学硕士学位。从事题为“复兴革命:中苏分裂,“第三世界”和左翼命运”的论文项目。查看所有笔记

获取原文
       

摘要

The Editors of the journal Cold War History have the pleasure to present this paper as the winner of the Best Paper Award at the last Graduate Conference on the Cold War, jointly organised every year by the University of California, Santa Barbara, the George Washington University, Washington DC, and the London School of Economics and Political Science, London. It is not often that a paper, as was the case with this one, won unanimous endorsement from prominent Cold War scholars from all three institutions, present at the Conference. The last Conference was organised in April 2009, at LSE, in London and the host of the next one to be held on 22-24 April 2010 will be the George Washington University. By continuing with the practice we inaugurated last year, we wish to underline our commitment to promoting and encouraging new and substantive research of the Cold War by young scholars. As the colonial system collapsed quicker than anticipated in the post-Second World War period, the Soviet Union found itself unprepared, and it hurriedly tried to build the institutions necessary to conduct an active foreign, economic and military policy in the newly emerging states. The development of the Sino-Soviet split triggered a Chinese challenge to this Soviet push for influence, with Beijing portraying the USSR as another white, imperialist power that valued relations with the West over the cause of national liberation. Moscow was consequently forced to adapt its policy, particularly by taking a more militant approach, in order to neutralise the Chinese threat.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2010.481426
机译:《冷战历史》杂志的编辑很高兴在上届冷战研究生会议上以“最佳论文奖”的获奖者身份发表论文,该会议由加利福尼亚大学,圣塔芭芭拉分校和乔治华盛顿大学每年联合举办华盛顿特区和伦敦政治经济学院。很少有论文像本论文一样,赢得出席会议的所有三个机构的著名冷战学者的一致认可。上一届会议于2009年4月在伦敦的伦敦证券交易所举行,下一届会议的主办国将于2010年4月22日至24日在乔治华盛顿大学举行。通过继续我们去年开始的实践,我们希望强调我们致力于促进和鼓励年轻学者对冷战进行新的实质性研究。由于殖民体系崩溃的速度比第二次世界大战后时期预期的要快,苏联发现自己没有做好准备,并急忙建立必要的机构,以在新兴国家实施积极的外交,经济和军事政策。中苏分裂的发展引发了中国人对苏联推动势力的挑战,北京将苏联描绘成另一种白人帝国主义大国,重视与西方在民族解放事业上的关系。因此,莫斯科被迫调整其政策,特别是采取更激进的方法,以消除对中国的威胁。查看全文下载全文相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes, twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2010.481426

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cold War History》 |2010年第2期|p.247-272|共26页
  • 作者

    Jeremy Friedmana*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:15:36
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号