首页> 外文期刊>Cold regions science and technology >Unconfined compressive strength and post-freeze-thaw behavior of fine-grained soils treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid
【24h】

Unconfined compressive strength and post-freeze-thaw behavior of fine-grained soils treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid

机译:土工纤维和合成流体处理的细粒土的无侧限抗压强度和冻融后特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study focuses on a relatively new non-traditional stabilizer (synthetic fluid) used in conjunction with geofiber to improve the strength characteristics of a low-plasticity fine-grained soil. The investigation is based on unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests. An efficient geofiber dosage was determined for the soil; treating it with geofiber only for the dosage rates varying from 0.2% to 1% by weight of dry soil. The individual contribution of the geofiber and synthetic fluid to the UCS gain was studied through testing each additive independently with the soil. Additionally, UCS tests were conducted on soil samples treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid together. All experiments were conducted for both unsoaked and soaked sample conditions. Strength developments were also investigated under freezing and thawing conditions. The treatment results are discussed in detail in terms of UCS and stress-strain response of the UCS test. The results demonstrate that the use of geofiber with synthetic fluid provided the highest UCS improvement (170% relative gain) in unsoaked samples when compared with the other treatment configurations. On the other hand, the synthetic fluid, when used alone, caused a relative decrease of 21% in the UCS of untreated soil in soaked conditions. The use of geofiber with synthetic fluid performed better in terms of the UCS under freezing and thawing conditions, while the synthetic fluid alone under the same conditions performed inadequately. The stress-strain responses of the soil treated with geofiber and synthetic fluid in terms of post-peak strength, strain hardening, and ductility were better than that of treated with synthetic fluid alone. Finally, the resilient modulus for the various treatment configurations was estimated from the UCS results. The findings indicate that the investigated soil stabilization technology appears to be promising for sites that can be represented by unsoaked conditions (i.e., where adequate drainage and unsaturated conditions can be ensured).
机译:这项研究的重点是与土工纤维结合使用的相对较新的非传统稳定剂(合成流体),以改善低塑性细粒土的强度特性。该调查基于无限制抗压强度(UCS)测试。确定了土壤的有效土工纤维剂量;仅用土工纤维对其进行处理,其用量比例为干燥土壤重量的0.2%至1%。通过与土壤独立地测试每种添加剂,研究了土工纤维和合成流体对UCS增益的贡献。另外,UCS测试是在用土纤维和合成液一起处理过的土壤样品上进行的。所有实验均针对未浸泡和浸泡的样品条件进行。还研究了在冻结和解冻条件下的强度发展。根据UCS和UCS测试的应力应变响应,详细讨论了治疗结果。结果表明,与其他处理配置相比,将土工纤维与合成流体一起使用可在未浸泡的样品中提供最高的UCS改善(相对增益为170%)。另一方面,如果单独使用合成液,则在浸泡条件下未经处理的土壤的UCS相对降低21%。就UCS而言,在冷冻和融化条件下,将土工纤维与合成流体配合使用时效果更好,而在相同条件下仅使用合成流体则表现不佳。用土纤维和合成液处理过的土壤在峰后强度,应变硬化和延展性方面的应力-应变响应要好于仅用合成液处理过的土壤。最后,根据UCS结果估算了各种处理配置的弹性模量。研究结果表明,对于可以通过未浸透条件(即可以确保足够的排水和不饱和条件)代表的场地而言,研究的土壤稳定技术似乎很有希望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号