首页> 外文期刊>Cold regions science and technology >Comparing ignitability for in situ burning of oil spills for an asphaltenic, a waxy and a light crude oil as a function of weathering conditions under arctic conditions
【24h】

Comparing ignitability for in situ burning of oil spills for an asphaltenic, a waxy and a light crude oil as a function of weathering conditions under arctic conditions

机译:比较北极条件下风化条件对沥青质,蜡质和轻质原油溢油现场燃烧的可燃性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In situ burning of oil spills in the Arctic is a promising countermeasure. In spite of the research already conducted more knowledge is needed especially regarding burning of weathered oils. This paper uses a new laboratory burning cell (100 mL sample) to test three Norwegian crude oils, Grane (asphalthenic), Kobbe (light oil) and Nome (waxy), for ignitability as a function of ice conditions and weathering degree. The crude oils (9 L) were weathered in a laboratory basin (4.8 m~3) under simulated arctic conditions (0, 50 and 90% ice cover). The laboratory burning tests show that the ignitability is dependent on oil composition, ice conditions and weathering degree. In open water, oil spills rapidly become "not ignitable" due to the weathering e.g. high water content and low content of residual volatile components. The slower weathering of oil spills in ice (50 and 90% ice cover) results in longer time-windows for the oil to be ignitable. The composition of the oils is important for the window of opportunity. The asphalthenic Grane crude oil had a limited timewindow for in situ burning (9 h or less), while the light Kobbe crude oil and the waxy Nome crude oil had the longest time-windows for in situ burning (from 18 h to more than 72 h). Such information regarding time windows for using in situ burning is very important for both contingency planning and operational use of in situ burning.
机译:在北极现场燃烧溢油是一种有前途的对策。尽管已经进行了研究,但仍需要更多的知识,尤其是在燃烧风化油方面。本文使用了一个新的实验室燃烧室(100毫升样品)来测试三种挪威原油,即Grane(沥青质),Kobbe(轻质油)和Nome(蜡质),其可燃性与冰况和风化程度有关。在模拟的北极条件(0、50和90%的冰盖)下,在实验室盆(4.8 m〜3)中风化了9 L原油。实验室燃烧测试表明,可燃性取决于油的成分,冰的条件和风化程度。在开阔的水域,由于天气原因,例如漏油,漏油迅速变得“不可燃”。高水含量和低含量的残留挥发性成分。冰块中溢油的风化较慢(50%和90%的冰覆盖)会导致更长的时间窗口使油着火。油的成分对于机会之窗很重要。沥青质Grane原油的现场燃烧时间窗口有限(少于9小时),而轻质Kobbe原油和蜡状Nome原油的现场燃烧时间窗口最长(从18小时到超过72小时) H)。关于用于现场燃烧的时间窗口的此类信息对于应急计划和现场燃烧的操作使用都是非常重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号