首页> 外文期刊>Cold regions science and technology >Field and laboratory performance of a cold-region sand stabilized with geofiber and synthetic fluid
【24h】

Field and laboratory performance of a cold-region sand stabilized with geofiber and synthetic fluid

机译:用土工纤维和合成流体稳定的寒区砂土的现场和实验室性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper presents results from a case study on the improvement of a poorly-graded sand through treatment with geofiber and synthetic fluid. The soil improvement technology was applied in the field at a site near Barrow, Alaska. The treatment at dosages of 0.25% geofiber and I% synthetic fluid was effective and met design requirements based on tests conducted shortly after the completion of the stabilization process. However, after going through a full freeze-thaw cycle, some deterioration in load bearing characteristics was encountered. Field CBR and soil stiffness tests were performed to quantify the strength loss in the soil. Additionally, an extensive and systematic laboratory testing program was implemented to investigate and evaluate the treatment dosages of the additives used. The laboratory tests evaluated each of the additives independently, as well as for their combined use. The best performance in the laboratory was obtained from samples containing 035% geofiber and 2% synthetic fluid. Freeze-thaw tests were performed on various compositions of treatment to study the potential factors responsible for the loss of strength encountered in the field. When subjected to freeze-thaw, samples experienced significant decrease in CBR performance. Also, a group of tests on cured samples were conducted to evaluate the time-dependency of soil treatment. The field dosage rates did not show any improvement with curing, however other treatment compositions indicated slight to moderate increase in CBR performance due to curing. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文介绍了一个案例研究的结果,该案例是通过土工纤维和合成流体处理来改善低级砂的效果。土壤改良技术已在阿拉斯加巴罗附近的一个场地上应用。以0.25%土工纤维和1%合成液的剂量进行处理是有效的,并且根据稳定化过程完成后不久进行的测试,达到了设计要求。但是,经过一个完整的冻融循环后,承重特性出现了一些恶化。进行了现场CBR和土壤刚度测试以量化土壤中的强度损失。另外,实施了广泛而系统的实验室测试程序,以调查和评估所用添加剂的治疗剂量。实验室测试分别评估了每种添加剂以及它们的组合使用。在实验室中,最佳性能是从包含035%土工纤维和2%合成液的样品中获得的。对各种处理成分进行了冻融测试,以研究造成现场强度下降的潜在因素。进行冻融后,样品的CBR性能显着下降。另外,对固化样品进行了一组测试,以评估土壤处理的时间依赖性。现场剂量率没有显示出随着固化的任何改善,但是其他处理组合物由于固化而显示出CBR性能的轻微到中等的增加。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号