...
首页> 外文期刊>Coastal engineering >Generating stable solitary waves with a piston-type wavemaker
【24h】

Generating stable solitary waves with a piston-type wavemaker

机译:用活塞式波发生器产生稳定的孤立波

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The generation of stable and pure solitary waves in large-scale experimental flumes and numerical models is the focus of this study. Such waves give a better description of the target wave amplitude, has minimal amplitude dissipation during propagation and has negligible trailing waves. In the present study, the two solitary wave generation methodologies, namely, Goring's Method (GM) and the Malek-Mohammadi and Testik Method (MMTM), described in Goring (1979) and Malek-Mohammadi and Testik (2010) respectively, have been used to examine the solitary wave solutions of Boussinesq, Rayleigh, Grimshaw and Fenton, both experimentally and numerically for three different relative wave height (epsilon), ratios of 0.1, 0.3 and 0.6. Numerical modeling is done within a Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) framework developed in Valizadeh and Rudman (2017). For each epsilon value, we have compared the experimental and numerical results in terms of the free surface profiles and the phase speeds to give recommendations for the solitary wave solution and the generation methodology that demonstrates the best performance. Our results indicate that the Rayleigh solitary wave solution gives more accurate profiles in both experiments and numerical simulations. With respect to wave generation methodology, the MMTM gives the best results in the experiments, whereas, the GM describes the target waves better in our numerical SPH simulations.
机译:在大型实验水槽和数值模型中稳定和纯孤立波的产生是本研究的重点。这样的波可以更好地描述目标波幅度,在传播过程中具有最小的幅度耗散,并且尾波可以忽略不计。在本研究中,Goring(1979)以及Malek-Mohammadi和Testik(2010)分别描述了两种孤立波生成方法,即Goring方法(GM)和Malek-Mohammadi和Testik方法(MMTM)。分别用于通过实验和数值方法研究Boussinesq,Rayleigh,Grimshaw和Fenton的孤立波解,分别针对三个不同的相对波高(ε),比值分别为0.1、0.3和0.6。数值建模是在Valizadeh和Rudman(2017)开发的平滑粒子流体动力学(SPH)框架内完成的。对于每个ε值,我们已经根据自由表面轮廓和相速度对实验和数值结果进行了比较,从而为孤立波解决方案和产生最佳性能的生成方法提供了建议。我们的结果表明,瑞利孤波解在实验和数值模拟中均提供了更准确的轮廓。关于波产生方法,MMTM在实验中给出了最佳结果,而GM在我们的数值SPH模拟中更好地描述了目标波。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Coastal engineering》 |2020年第4期|103633.1-103633.14|共14页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Indian Inst Technol Dept Civil Engn Mumbai 400076 Maharashtra India|Monash Univ Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn Melbourne Vic 3800 Australia;

    Indian Inst Technol Dept Civil Engn Mumbai 400076 Maharashtra India;

    Monash Univ Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn Melbourne Vic 3800 Australia;

    Monash Univ Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn Melbourne Vic 3800 Australia|DHI Water & Environm Pty Ltd Gold Coast Qld 4217 Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Solitary wave; Physical modeling; Wave generation; Piston-type wavemaker; Numerical modeling; SPH;

    机译:孤波物理建模;波浪产生;活塞式造波器;数值建模;SPH;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号