首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Risk >Case in focus: Claim for psychiatric injury caused by hospital misinformation - Farrell v Avon Health Authority
【24h】

Case in focus: Claim for psychiatric injury caused by hospital misinformation - Farrell v Avon Health Authority

机译:重点案例:因医院错误信息引起的精神伤害索赔-Farrell诉Avon Health Authority

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

THE FACTS OFnFARRELL1nAfter one liaison in May 1991 thenClaimant discovered that he was to benthe father of a child. On 4 Februaryn1992 he was told that he had a sonnwho had been born prematurely andnwas in the special baby care unit atnSouthmead Hospital in Bristol.nThe Claimant left the pub innwhich he was drinking and was drivennby a friend to the hospital. On arrivalnhe identified himself and was shownninto a small room with a crib. Twonnurses came in. The Claimant askednwhether the baby was all right. Onennurse replied:n‘Oh, you don’t know. [the baby] diednabout an hour ago.’nHe was asked whether he would likento see the baby. He said he would.nThe baby was brought into the roomnand placed in a crib. The Claimantnpicked up the baby, cuddled it andncried over it.nTwenty minutes or so passed. Thennurses returned. They told him thatnthere had been a mistake and that thenbaby he was holding was not his andnthat his baby was alive.nThe Claimant visited his son. Henstayed only 5 minutes and then wentnout to the car and was sick. ThenClaimant went on to develop posttraumaticnstress disorder.
机译:事实1991年5月一次联络后,克莱曼特发现他要生一个孩子的父亲。 1992年2月4日,他被告知他有一个早产儿,他曾在布里斯托尔Southmead医院的特殊婴儿护理室中生活。n索赔人离开了他正在喝酒的客栈,并被朋友带到医院。到达时,他表明了自己的身份,并被带到一个带婴儿床的小房间里。 Twonnurses进来了。索赔人问婴儿是否还好。 Onennurse回答:n'哦,你不知道。 [婴儿]大约一个小时前死亡。’n他被问到他是否愿意去看婴儿。他说会的。婴儿被带到房间里,放在婴儿床里。索赔人捡起婴儿,抱着它,对它进行了手术。二十分钟左右过去了。名词返回。他们告诉他这不是一个错误,那么他所抱着的孩子不是他的,并且他的孩子还活着。索赔人探访了他的儿子。 Henstay只停留了5分钟,然后就没上车,病了。然后,克莱曼继续发展为创伤后应激障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号