...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Research in Cardiology >Evaluation of hospitals regarding outcomes and baseline risk
【24h】

Evaluation of hospitals regarding outcomes and baseline risk

机译:评估医院的结局和基线风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Monitoring of hospital performance is increasingly used in the process of improving the quality of health care. Various approaches to quality assessment and publication of the results are discussed. Therefore, a method acceptable for clinicians in the hospitals is urgently needed. As the case mix of the patients differs considerably across hospitals, any assessment based on outcome measures has to be adjusted for the patients’ risk profiles. We use a method of calculation and presentation that relates the observed complication rate of one centre to the mean rate that would be expected for similar patients in the other centres. We argue that this procedure might especially meet the demands of clinicians in the centres. Data from 44 hospitals in the German Cypher Stent Registry are used to exemplify the proposed procedure. Results A large variation in the cumulative incidence of MACE within 6 months (range 0–12.2%) as well as in the prevalence of selected risk factors was observed across hospitals. Using a logistic prediction model, the differences in risk profiles of the patient populations in the centres resulted in a wide range of expected MACE rates (2.55–5.44%). The outcome of seven centres differed significantly from the expectation.
机译:在改善卫生保健质量的过程中,越来越多地使用对医院绩效的监控。讨论了各种质量评估和结果公布的方法。因此,迫切需要一种医院临床医生可接受的方法。由于各医院患者的病例组合差异很大,因此必须根据患者的风险状况调整任何基于结果指标的评估。我们使用一种计算和表示的方法,将一个中心的观察到的并发症发生率与其他中心的类似患者所期望的平均发生率联系起来。我们认为该程序可能特别满足中心临床医生的需求。来自德国Cypher支架注册中心44家医院的数据被用来举例说明所提议的程序。结果在各家医院中,观察到6个月内MACE的累积发生率(范围为0–12.2%)以及所选危险因素的发生率存在很大差异。使用逻辑预测模型,各中心患者人群的风险谱差异导致预期的MACE发生率范围很广(2.55-5.44%)。七个中心的结果与预期有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号