...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of health governance >Research on hospital-based shared governance: a scoping review
【24h】

Research on hospital-based shared governance: a scoping review

机译:医院分享治理研究:审查综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to review research on hospital-based shared governance (SG), focussing on its core elements.Design/methodology/approach - A scoping review was conducted by searching the Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Medic, ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest) and SveMed+ databases using SG and related concepts in hospital settings as search terms (May 1998-February 2019). Only original research articles examining SG were included. The reference lists of the selected articles were reviewed. Data were extracted from the selected articles by charting and then subjected to a thematic analysis.Findings - The review included 13 original research articles that examined SG in hospital settings. The studied organizations had implemented SG in different ways, and many struggled to obtain satisfactory results. SG was executed within individual professions or multiple professions and was typically implemented at both unit- and organization-levels. The thematic analysis revealed six core elements of SG as follows: professionalism, shared decision-making, evidence-based practice, continuous quality improvement, collaboration and empowerment.Practical implications - An SG framework for hospital settings was developed based on the core elements of SG, the participants and the organizational levels involved. Hospitals considering SG should prepare for a time-consuming process that requires belief in the core elements of SG. The SG framework can be used as a tool to implement and strengthen SG in organizations.Originality/value - The review resumes the tradition of systematically reviewing SG literature, which had not been done in the 21st century. General tendencies of the research scene and research gaps are pointed out.
机译:目的 - 本研究的目的是审查基于医院的共享治理(SG)的研究,专注于其核心元素.Design/Methodology/Approach - 通过搜索Medline(Ovid),Cinahl(EBSCO)进行范围审查。 ,Medic,Abi / Inform Collection(Proquest)和SVEMED +数据库使用SG和医院设置中的相关概念作为搜索条件(1998年5月 - 2019年2月)。仅包括审查SG的原始研究文章。审查所选文章的参考列表。通过图表从所选物品中提取数据,然后进行主题分析.Findings - 审查包括13篇的原始研究文章,在医院环境中检查了SG。学习组织以不同的方式实施了SG,许多人努力获得满意的结果。 SG在各个职业或多个职业内执行,通常在单位和组织级别实施。主题分析揭示了SG的六个核心要素:专业性,共同决策,证据的实践,持续的质量改进,合作和赋予权力。正门含义 - 基于SG的核心要素开发了医院环境的SG框架,参与者和所涉及的组织级别。考虑SG的医院应该准备耗时的过程,需要信仰SG的核心要素。 SG框架可作为实施和加强组织中SG的工具.解/价值 - 审查恢复了系统地审查SG文学的传统,这些传统在21世纪尚未完成。指出了研究现场的一般趋势和研究差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号