...
首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >The impact of compensatory measures on public support for carbon taxation: an experimental study in Sweden
【24h】

The impact of compensatory measures on public support for carbon taxation: an experimental study in Sweden

机译:补偿性措施对公众支持碳税的影响:瑞典的一项实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study aims at better understanding how, and to what extent, perceptions of a policy instrument's distributional effects impact on policy support, focusing on the case of CO2 taxes on petrol in Sweden. Through a large-scale (N = 5000) randomized survey experiment with a 2 x 3 factorial design, the extent to which perceptions of fairness determine attitudes to a suggested increase of the Swedish CO2 tax is explored. Furthermore, the study considers whether these effects change with the level of the suggested tax increase, as well as whether negative sentiments can be alleviated by combining it with a compensatory measure in the shape of a simultaneous income tax cut financed by the revenues from the tax increase. The results show that a higher tax increase is both viewed as more unfair and enjoys weaker support. Furthermore, compensatory measures can be a powerful policy design tool to increase perceptions of the policy as fair, but the effect of compensation on policy support is conditioned by the individual's left-right ideological position. Whereas people self-identifying to the right react favourably to compensatory measures, people self-identifying to the left become less supportive of a tax increase when combined with a simultaneous cut in income taxes. Key policy insights Perceptions of fairness are highly important for explaining public support for climate policy tools, specifically CO2 taxes. Compensatory measures can be a powerful policy design tool to increase perceptions of the policy as less unfair. However, the effect of compensatory measures on policy support is conditioned by ideological position, and only successful among people to the ideological right. In contexts dominated by right-wing ideals, a combination of a tax and a compensatory scheme may be a successful route forward towards increased climate policy support. In left-oriented contexts the results imply that a CO2 tax without compensation seems more likely to increase support.
机译:这项研究旨在更好地了解政策工具的分布效应如何以及在多大程度上对政策支持产生影响,重点是瑞典对汽油征收二氧化碳税的情况。通过采用2 x 3析因设计的大规模(N = 5000)随机调查实验,探索了对公平的看法决定了对瑞典二氧化碳税建议增加的态度的程度。此外,研究考虑了这些影响是否随建议的增税水平而变化,以及是否可以通过将其与补偿措施相结合来缓解负面情绪,这种补偿措施的形式是通过税收收入资助的同时削减所得税增加。结果表明,提高税收既被认为是更不公平的,又受到较弱的支持。此外,补偿性措施可以是一种强有力的政策设计工具,可以增强人们对政策公正性的认识,但是补偿对政策支持的影响取决于个人的左右意识形态立场。向右自我识别的人对补偿措施反应良好,而向左自我识别的人在与同时削减所得税相结合时,对增加税收的支持就较少。重要政策见解公平感对于解释公众对气候政策工具特别是二氧化碳税的支持至关重要。补偿性措施可以成为一种强有力的政策设计工具,可以增强人们对政策的公正性的认识。但是,补偿措施对政策支持的影响取决于意识形态的地位,只有在具有意识形态权利的人中才能取得成功。在以右翼理想为主导的情况下,税收和补偿性计划的结合可能是迈向增加气候政策支持的成功途径。在左倾的情况下,结果表明,没有补偿的二氧化碳税似乎更有可能增加支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号