首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Next steps in geoengineering scenario research: limited deployment scenarios and beyond
【24h】

Next steps in geoengineering scenario research: limited deployment scenarios and beyond

机译:地球工程方案研究的下一步:有限的部署方案及其他

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Climate engineering has received increasing attention, but its discussion has remained on the sidelines of mainstream climate policy. The policy relevance of this previously exotic option is poised to rise because of the gap between the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement and slow global mitigation efforts. It is therefore crucial to understand the risks and benefits of the proposed schemes, and the social implications of policy choices. Assessment of the risks and benefits of solar geoengineering strongly depends on scenarios, but previous scenarios have not reflected the full range of social choices. In light of concerns over risks, a newer set of scenarios is desirable, which represents both uncertainties and social choices more fully. Borrowing and extending lessons from recent literature on the new community climate scenario process, we envision a possible scenario-building process that combines interdisciplinary scholarship with the involvement of stakeholders and citizens. The resultant scenarios would better characterize uncertainties of, and policy choices for, solar geoengineering, and foster critical appraisal of its risks and benefits. Such societal choices might include not only total ban and large-scale deployment, but also limited deployment, which has received less attention in the scenario literature. The interaction between scenario and governance research would be able to highlight the central issues at stake, including ethical, social, and political dimensions.Key policy insightsA more comprehensive assessment of solar geoengineering is necessary to evaluate its risks and benefits, necessitating new scenario researchIt is crucial to reflect the full span of policy choices and uncertainties with interdisciplinary collaboration in such scenariosSuch societal choices might include not only total ban and large-scale deployment, but also limited deployment, which has received less attention in the scenario literatureParticipatory scenario research would enable incorporating the concerns and opinions of stakeholders and citizens in scenario creation
机译:气候工程越来越受到关注,但其讨论仍停留在主流气候政策的边缘。由于《巴黎协定》的温度目标与缓慢的全球缓解努力之间的差距,这种以前具有异国情调的选择的政策相关性有望上升。因此,至关重要的是要了解拟议计划的风险和收益以及政策选择的社会影响。对太阳能地球工程风险和收益的评估在很大程度上取决于方案,但是以前的方案并未反映出社会选择的全部范围。考虑到对风险的担忧,需要一种新的方案集,它代表了不确定性和更全面的社会选择。借用和借鉴最新文献中有关新的社区气候情景过程的经验教训,我们设想了一个可能的情景构建过程,它将跨学科的学术与利益相关者和公民的参与相结合。由此产生的情景将更好地表征太阳能地球工程的不确定性和政策选择,并促进对其风险和收益的严格评估。这样的社会选择可能不仅包括全面禁止和大规模部署,还包括有限的部署,这在方案文献中受到的关注较少。方案与治理研究之间的互动将能够突出显示所涉及的核心问题,包括道德,社会和政治方面的关键政策见解对太阳能地球工程进行更全面的评估以评估其风险和收益是必要的,因此有必要进行新的方案研究。在这种情况下,反映跨学科合作的政策选择和不确定性的全部范围至关重要。这种社会选择可能不仅包括全面禁止和大规模部署,还包括有限的部署,这在方案文献中受到了较少的关注。利益相关者和公民在场景创建中的关注和观点

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号