Future mitigation commitments: differentiating among non-Annex Ⅰ countries

摘要

In the long term, any definition of adequacy consistent with UNFCCC Article 2 will require increased mitigation efforts from almost all countries. Therefore, an expansion of emission limitation commitments will form a central element of any future architecture of the climate regime. This expansion has two elements: deepening of quantitative commitments for Annex B countries and the adoption of commitments for those countries outside of the current limitation regime. This article seeks to provide a more analytical basis for further differentiation among non-Annex Ⅰ countries. To be both fair and reflective of national circumstances, it is based on the criteria of responsibility, capability and potential to mitigate. Altogether, non-Annex Ⅰ countries were differentiated in four groups, each including countries with similar national circumstances: newly industrialized countries (NICs), rapidly industrializing countries (RIDCs), 'other developing countries', and least developed countries (LDCs). Based on the same criteria that were used for differentiating among non-Annex Ⅰ countries, a set of decision rules was developed to assign mitigation and financial transfer commitments to each group of countries (including Annex Ⅰ countries). Applying these decision rules results in (strict) reduction commitments for Annex Ⅰ countries, but also implies quantifiable mitigation obligations for NICs and RIDCs, assisted by financial transfers from the North. Other developing countries are obliged to take qualitative commitments, but quantifiable mitigation commitments for these countries and the LDC group would be not justifiable. As national circumstances in countries evolve over time, the composition of the groups will change according to agreed triggers.