...
首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Shaping the 'Energy Union': between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy
【24h】

Shaping the 'Energy Union': between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy

机译:建立“能源联盟”:在欧盟能源和气候政策的国家立场与治理创新之间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Energy Union' can be seen as the most significant policy idea that seeks to reform European energy governance, policy and regional cooperation. However, so far the concept is mostly an empty box in which every stakeholder tries to put whatever is on the top of their priority list. This article reviews three major theoretical approaches to the analysis of European integration and EU policy that can be used to study the ongoing process of Energy Union formation. It then tries to structure the discussion by showing the evolution of the Energy Union concept, focusing on proposals by D. Tusk, J-C. Juncker and the European Commission, followed by a comparative analysis of four country cases representing different energy mixes and energy policy directions: Germany, France, Poland and Norway. All of these proposals are described and assessed according to their emphasis on the three dimensions of energy policy: security, affordability and sustainability. We sketch two possible scenarios for the future of EU energy policy, as suggested by the intergovernmentalist and supranationalist approaches and emphasize the potential impact of the governance mechanism of the Energy Union, which could reach far beyond what is expected and provide welcome coherence in Europe's energy and climate policy.Policy relevanceThe article structures the policy debate on the Energy Union, discussing the different elements and instruments proposed by key EU actors and provides a useful overview of national interests of some important players, set in the context of their wider systemic conditions and policy goals. The framework for comparing the different proposals and national positions is built around the energy policy triangle'. The article concludes with a discussion of possible future scenarios, as well as an in-depth discussion of the potential role of the governance mechanism.
机译:能源联盟”可以看作是旨在改革欧洲能源治理,政策和区域合作的最重要的政策构想。但是,到目前为止,该概念主要是一个空白框,每个利益相关者都在其中尝试将任何内容放在其优先级列表的顶部。本文回顾了分析欧洲一体化和欧盟政策的三种主要理论方法,这些方法可用于研究正在进行的能源联盟的形成过程。然后,它试图通过展示能源联盟概念的演变来构建讨论,重点放在J.C的D. Tusk的提案上。容克和欧盟委员会,随后对代表不同能源结构和能源政策方向的四个国家案例进行了比较分析:德国,法国,波兰和挪威。根据对能源政策三个方面的强调,对所有这些建议进行了描述和评估:安全性,可负担性和可持续性。正如政府间主义者和超国家主义者所建议的那样,我们概述了欧盟能源政策未来的两种可能情况,并强调了能源联盟治理机制的潜在影响,这种影响可能远远超出预期,并在欧洲能源中提供了令人欢迎的连贯性。政策相关性本文构成了关于能源联盟的政策辩论,讨论了欧盟主要行动者提出的不同要素和文书,并提供了一些重要参与者的国家利益的有益概览,这些参与者是在其更广泛的系统条件和背景下制定的。政策目标。比较不同提案和国家立场的框架围绕“能源政策三角”建立。本文最后讨论了未来可能发生的情况,并对治理机制的潜在作用进行了深入讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号