首页> 外文期刊>Climate dynamics >Evaluating explanatory models of the spatial pattern of surface climate trends using model selection and bayesian averaging methods
【24h】

Evaluating explanatory models of the spatial pattern of surface climate trends using model selection and bayesian averaging methods

机译:使用模型选择和贝叶斯平均方法评估地表气候趋势空间模式的解释性模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We evaluate three categories of variables for explaining the spatial pattern of warming and cooling trends over land: predictions of general circulation models (GCMs) in response to observed forcings; geographical factors like latitude and pressure; and socioeconomic influences on the land surface and data quality. Spatial autocorrelation (SAC) in the observed trend pattern is removed from the residuals by a well-specified explanatory model. Encompassing tests show that none of the three classes of variables account for the contributions of the other two, though 20 of 22 GCMs individually contribute either no significant explanatory power or yield a trend pattern negatively correlated with observations. Non-nested testing rejects the null hypothesis that socioeconomic variables have no explanatory power. We apply a Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) method to search over all possible linear combinations of explanatory variables and generate posterior coefficient distributions robust to model selection. These results, confirmed by classical encompassing tests, indicate that the geographical variables plus three of the 22 GCMs and three socioeconomic variables provide all the explanatory power in the data set. We conclude that the most valid model of the spatial pattern of trends in land surface temperature records over 1979-2002 requires a combination of the processes represented in some GCMs and certain socioeconomic measures that capture data quality variations and changes to the land surface.
机译:我们评估了三类变量来解释土地变暖和降温趋势的空间格局:响应于观测到的强迫的一般循环模型(GCM)的预测;纬度和压力等地理因素;以及对土地表面和数据质量的社会经济影响。通过明确指定的解释模型,可以从残差中去除观察到的趋势模式中的空间自相关(SAC)。包含的检验表明,尽管22个GCM中的20个单独贡献了不显着的解释力或产生了与观测值呈负相关的趋势模式,但三类变量均未解释其他两个变量的贡献。非嵌套测试拒绝了零假设,即社会经济变量没有解释力。我们应用贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)方法来搜索解释变量的所有可能线性组合,并生成对模型选择具有鲁棒性的后验系数分布。这些结果通过经典的包围试验得到证实,表明地理变量加上22个GCM中的三个以及三个社会经济变量提供了数据集中的所有解释力。我们得出的结论是,最有效的1979-2002年地表温度记录趋势空间格局模型需要结合一些GCM所代表的过程和某些能够捕获数据质量变化和地表变化的社会经济措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号