首页> 外文期刊>Clean technologies and environmental policy >The production of fuels and chemicals in the new world: critical analysis of the choice between crude oil and biomass vis-a-vis sustainability and the environment
【24h】

The production of fuels and chemicals in the new world: critical analysis of the choice between crude oil and biomass vis-a-vis sustainability and the environment

机译:新世界的燃料和化学品的生产:对原油和生物量达到可持续性和环境的选择的关键分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Energy and the environment are intimately related and hotly debated issues. Today's crude oil-based economy for the manufacture of fuels, chemicals and materials will not have a sustainable future. The over-use of oil products has done a great damage to the environment. Faced with the twin challenges of sustaining socioeconomic development and shrinking the environmental footprint of chemicals and fuel manufacturing, a major emphasis is on either converting biomass into low-value, high-volume biofuels or refining it into a wide spectrum of products. Using carbon for fuel is a flawed approach and unlikely to achieve any nation's socioeconomic or environmental targets. Biomass is chemically and geographically incompatible with the existing refining and pipeline infrastructure, and biorefining and biofuels production in their current forms will not achieve economies of scale in most nations. Synergistic use of crude oil, biomass, and shale gas to produce fuels, value-added chemicals, and commodity chemicals, respectively, can continue for some time. However, carbon should not be used as a source of fuel or energy but be valorized to other products. In controlling CO_2 emissions, hydrogen will play a critical role. Hydrogen is best suited for converting waste biomass and carbon dioxide emanated from different sources, whether it be fossil fuel-derived carbon or biomass-derived carbon, into fuels and chemicals as well as it will also lead, on its own as energy source, to the carbon negative scenario in conjunction with other renewable non-carbon sources. This new paradigm for production of fuels and chemicals not only offers the greatest monetization potential for biomass and shale gas, but it could also scale down output and improve the atom and energy economies of oil refineries. We have also highlighted the technology gaps with the intention to drive R&D in these directions. We believe this article will generate a considerable debate in energy sector and lead to better energy and material policy across the world.
机译:能源和环境密切相关和热烈的辩论问题。今天原油生产的燃料,化学品和材料的制造不具有可持续发展的未来。石油产品的过度使用对环境产生了很大的损害。面对持续社会经济发展的双重挑战,并缩小化学品和燃料制造的环境足迹,重点强调将生物质转化为低价,大批量生物燃料或将其改进到广泛的产品中。使用碳来燃料是一种有缺陷的方法,不太可能实现任何国家的社会经济或环境目标。生物量与现有的炼油和管道基础设施化学和地理位置不相容,以及其目前形式的生物化和生物燃料生产不会在大多数国家实现规模经济。协同使用原油,生物质和页岩气,分别产生燃料,增值化学品和商品化学品,可以持续一段时间。然而,碳不应用作燃料或能量的来源,但储存到其他产品。在控制CO_2排放时,氢将发挥关键作用。氢气最适合将废物生物质和二氧化碳转化为不同来源的废物,无论是化石燃料源碳还是生物质衍生的碳,还可以为燃料和化学品,也将其作为能源作为能源源。碳负面情景与其他可再生非碳源相结合。这种用于生产燃料和化学品的新型范式不仅为生物质和页岩气体提供了最大的货币化潜力,而且还可以扩大产出和改善石油炼油厂的原子和能源经济。我们还强调了技术差距,目的是在这些方向上驾驶研发。我们认为本文将在能源部门产生相当大的辩论,并导致全球更好的能源和物质政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号