首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering >State Court Grants Damages To Contractor for Subcontractor's Withdrawn Bid
【24h】

State Court Grants Damages To Contractor for Subcontractor's Withdrawn Bid

机译:州法院授予承包商分包商撤回投标的赔偿金

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IN THE construction industry, furnishing quotes and bid prices is considered by most to be a risky business. The reason is that general contractors are legally bound to honor the price contained in their proposals if a contract is awarded. At the subcontracting level, the same general principle applies. During bid preparation, contractors solicit multiple quotes for a particular scope of work in search of the lowest price. If any subcontractor withdraws its bid before submission of the general contractors bid, it is generally considered "no harm, no foul." In other words, no contract was formed obligating the subcontractor to its price because the general contractor had not yet "accepted" the subcontractors "offer." But what kind of legal exposure occurs when a subcontractor withdraws its bid after the general contractor relies on it to obtain an award?
机译:在建筑行业中,提供报价和投标价格被大多数人视为具有风险的业务。原因是如果授予合同,总承包商在法律上有义务遵守其建议书中包含的价格。在转包层面,适用相同的一般原则。在准备投标过程中,承包商会针对特定工作范围索取多个报价,以寻求最低价格。如果任何分包商在提交总承包商的投标书之前撤回其投标书,则通常被认为“没有伤害,没有犯规”。换句话说,由于总承包商尚未“接受”分包商的“要约”,因此未签订任何合同,要求分包商承担其价格。但是,如果总承包商依靠分包商获得要约而分包商撤回标书,会发生什么样的法律风险?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Civil Engineering》 |2011年第9期|p.80|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号