...
首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering >Cycle route network development and evaluation using spatial multi-criteria analysis and shortest path analysis
【24h】

Cycle route network development and evaluation using spatial multi-criteria analysis and shortest path analysis

机译:使用空间多准则分析和最短路径分析的自行车道网络开发和评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The study set out to develop an objective method for the development and evaluation of cycle route networks as its primary aim. The case study undertaken demonstrates that this was achieved, as stakeholder engagement is facilitated, it is universal and adaptable and can include a variety of qualities and criteria, it is transparent and back-traceable, and the quantitative scores assigned to routes allow for an objective comparison of alternatives. The intended requirements not completely met are that it needs to be uncomplicated and user-friendly, and that it must be cost-effective and time-efficient. A fair level of skill is required to set the model up, but it is easy to understand from a stakeholder perspective when taken through the process. The cost and time to collect geo-spatial data can also be extensive if the data is not readily available. This can in part be overcome by reprocessing datasets for different criteria, as was demonstrated in the case study. However, it is recommended that further research should be done into the relationships between criteria and data, and the pre-processing required to get them into the correct format. A guideline document detailing how data can be used as a proxy where information is missing is then drawn up to assist planners in the development of the model.
机译:该研究着手开发一种客观的方法,以开发和评估自行车道网络为主要目标。进行的案例研究表明,实现了这一目标,这是因为促进了利益相关者的参与,它具有普遍性和适应性,可以包括各种质量和标准,它是透明的和可追溯的,分配给路线的定量得分可以实现一个目标。替代方案的比较。尚未完全满足的预期要求是:它必须简单且用户友好,并且必须具有成本效益和时间效率。建立模型需要一定水平的技能,但是从整个流程的角度来看,从利益相关者的角度很容易理解。如果数据不易获得,则收集地理空间数据的成本和时间也可能很庞大。如案例研究所示,这可以通过重新处理不同标准的数据集来部分克服。但是,建议对标准和数据之间的关系以及将其转换为正确格式所需的预处理进行进一步研究。然后起草了一份指导文件,详细说明了如何将数据用作缺少信息的代理,以帮助计划人员开发模型。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Civil Engineering》 |2019年第8期|40-45|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Aurecon South Africa (Pty) Ltd;

    Department of Civil Engineering University of Cape Town;

  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号