首页> 外文期刊>City >Seeking Spatial Justice: Part Three Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city
【24h】

Seeking Spatial Justice: Part Three Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city

机译:寻求空间正义:第三部分社会或空间正义? Marcuse和Soja在城市的右边

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper offers a brief comparative reading of how Peter Marcuse and Edward Soja conceptualise the spatiality of justice and the right to the city. The work of both of these authors has been featured in City in recent issues, and while there are clear differences in their approaches, I argue that there are also points of convergence. In particular, both Marcuse and Soja insist that working towards the 'right to the city' is not only a matter of re-ordering urban spaces, it is also a matter of attacking the wider processes and relations which generate forms of injustice in cities. In making this case, the paper provides an illustration of my belief that both Marcuse and Soja are right in arguing that a commitment to the 'right to the city' can serve as the 'common cause' or 'glue that binds' for radical theorists and activists across their differences.
机译:本文简要比较了彼得·马尔库塞(Peter Marcuse)和爱德华·索亚(Edward Soja)如何将正义的空间性和城市权概念化的过程。这两位作者的工作在最近一期的《城市》中都有所报道,尽管他们的方法存在明显差异,但我认为也存在一些趋同点。特别是,马尔库塞(Marcuse)和索亚(Soja)都坚持致力于“城市权”不仅是对城市空间进行重新排序的问题,而且还涉及对在城市中产生不公正现象的广泛过程和关系的攻击。在提出这种情况时,本文举例说明了我的信念,即马尔库塞(Marcuse)和索雅(Soja)都认为对“城市权”的承诺可以作为激进理论家的“共同原因”或“胶粘剂”是正确的。和维权人士之间的分歧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号