首页> 外文期刊>City >Re-classifying London: a growing middle class and increasing inequality: A response to Mark Davidson and Elvin Wyly's 'Class-ifying London: Questioning Social Division and Space Claims in the Post-industrial Metropolis'
【24h】

Re-classifying London: a growing middle class and increasing inequality: A response to Mark Davidson and Elvin Wyly's 'Class-ifying London: Questioning Social Division and Space Claims in the Post-industrial Metropolis'

机译:重新分类伦敦:不断增长的中产阶级和不平等现象:对马克·戴维森和艾尔文·怀利的“伦敦分类:质疑后工业都市中的社会分裂和空间主张”的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The paper is a response to Davidson and Wyly. While we agree with them that class and class conflict is an important element of cities, we disagree with many of their claims and assertions regarding our work. In particular, we argue that the growth of the middle class does not mean that we consider the working class unimportant or to have largely disappeared as they suggest. This is to muddle empirical findings and political agendas. The working class is still clearly present, even though it has shrunk. Nor does the growth of the middle class imply that inequality has become unimportant. On the contrary, we argue that the growth of the middle class is one of the key reasons why London has become more unequal. We take issue with their claim that the middle class does not exist, and we argue that their analysis of 2001 census data, while interesting, does not look at the changes which have taken place over time.
机译:该论文是对戴维森和怀利的回应。尽管我们同意他们的观点,即阶级和阶级冲突是城市的重要因素,但我们不同意他们对我们工作的许多主张和主张。尤其是,我们认为中产阶级的增长并不意味着我们认为工人阶级不重要或已经按照他们的建议消失了。这是为了混淆经验发现和政治议程。尽管工人阶级缩水了,但工人阶级仍然明显存在。中产阶级的增长也并不意味着不平等变得不重要。相反,我们认为中产阶级的增长是伦敦变得更加不平等的关键原因之一。我们对他们关于中产阶级不存在的说法持怀疑态度,我们认为他们对2001年人口普查数据的分析虽然有趣,但却没有考虑随着时间的推移发生的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号