...
首页> 外文期刊>Circuits Assembly >Optimizing Component Placement: CMM vs. AOI
【24h】

Optimizing Component Placement: CMM vs. AOI

机译:优化元件放置:CMM与AOI

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The importance of quality control in printed circuit board (PCB) assembly is intensifying in proportion to the shrinking geometries of boards and components. The challenge for placement equipment is also increasing as these shrinking components are extremely fragile. Inline automatic optical inspection (AOI) systems used for inspection, verification and measurement after component placement can help maintain a level of quality that seems to work well for most standard board configurations. However, AOI systems do not lend themselves to the proactive statistical process control (SPC) that is required for effectively streamlining today's highly complicated assembly lines. Today, performance baselines must be established based on knowledge of machine characteristics and using in-process and additional monitoring and trend analysis to anticipate and prevent defects. Rework used to be an expected part of production, but now it is avoided as much as possible because of the added cost factor and because many new assembly technologies and materials simply cannot be reworked. SPC can minimize both unscheduled downtimes and defective boards. The ability to adjust the process based on defects when they do occur allows continuous quality improvement.
机译:随着印刷电路板和组件尺寸的不断缩小,质量控制在印刷电路板(PCB)组件中的重要性正日益增强。由于这些收缩部件极其脆弱,因此放置设备面临的挑战也越来越大。用于部件放置后的检查,验证和测量的在线自动光学检查(AOI)系统可以帮助维持一定的质量水平,该质量水平似乎对于大多数标准板配置都适用。但是,AOI系统并不适合有效简化当今高度复杂的装配线所需的主动统计过程控制(SPC)。如今,必须基于对机器特性的了解并使用过程中以及其他监视和趋势分析来预测和预防缺陷,从而建立性能基准。返工曾经是生产的预期部分,但由于增加了成本因素,而且由于许多新的组装技术和材料根本无法返工,因此现在尽可能避免返工。 SPC可以最大程度地减少计划外的停机时间和有缺陷的电路板。能够在缺陷确实发生时根据缺陷进行调整,从而可以不断提高质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号