首页> 外文期刊>Circuitree >Flex Circuitry Versus Wiring Harnesses
【24h】

Flex Circuitry Versus Wiring Harnesses

机译:柔性电路和线束

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

How much more reliable are flexes over wiring harnesses? I've heard 75 percent thrown about, but I can't find the data to support it. While there is little doubt that flex circuitry is generally more reliable than wiring harnesses, it is difficult to quantify. It really depends on several different factors that are application specific, such as the complexity of the wiring, form and fit requirements, and shock and vibration the wiring will experience in service. Complexity: Flex has a definite advantage in this category when compared to a similar wiring harness. Because every feature on a flex circuit is defined by CAD data, each and every one is exactly the same (i.e., never a wiring error). Also, on a complex wiring harness, there is always the possibility that a single wire in a bundle may be slightly shorter than the others, causing a stress concentration point where it is attached to the connector. This stress concentration point may result in a broken connection if the harness is subjected to shock or vibration. For simple wiring harnesses (less than a dozen or so connections), the flex advantage is not as great.
机译:线束比线束可靠多少?我听说有75%的问题,但我找不到支持它的数据。尽管毫无疑问,柔性电路通常比线束更可靠,但很难量化。它实际上取决于特定于应用程序的几个不同因素,例如接线的复杂性,形状和装配要求以及接线在使用中会遭受的震动和冲击。复杂性:与类似的线束相比,Flex在这一类别中具有绝对的优势。由于柔性电路上的每个功能部件均由CAD数据定义,因此每个功能部件都完全相同(即,绝不会出现接线错误)。而且,在复杂的线束上,总有这样的可能性:一束中的单根电线可能比其他电线稍短,从而在连接到连接器的地方引起应力集中点。如果线束受到冲击或振动,此应力集中点可能会导致连接断开。对于简单的线束(少于一打左右的连接),挠性优势不那么大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号