...
首页> 外文期刊>Circuitree >C'mon Baby, Let's Do the Twist!
【24h】

C'mon Baby, Let's Do the Twist!

机译:来吧宝贝,让我们扭吧!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The answer could be a definitely yes, or positively no, or somewhere in between. It really depends on the circuit construction (i.e total thickness) and also the parameters of the bending and twisting. Let me start with the bending.The amount of bending that a circuit can handle is directly related to the overall circuit thickness and also to the radius of the bend. Each time the circuit is bent, the outermost layers will slightly stretch and the inner layers will slightly compress. The smaller the bend radius, the more stretching and compressing the circuit will be subjected to. Also, the thicker the circuit is, the more exaggerated these stresses become. These microscopic stresses can take a severe toll on the flex if they are not taken into account at the design stage. IPC-2223 Sectional Design Standard to Flexible Printed Boards contains formulas for minimum bend radii, but these are really aimed more at flex-to-install applica-tions and not dynamic applications like die one you have described.
机译:答案可能是肯定的,也可能是肯定的,或者介于两者之间。它实际上取决于电路结构(即总厚度)以及弯曲和扭曲的参数。让我从弯曲开始,电路可以处理的弯曲量与整个电路厚度以及弯曲半径直接相关。每次弯曲电路时,最外层将略微拉伸,而内层将略微压缩。弯曲半径越小,回路承受的拉伸和压缩就越大。而且,电路越厚,这些应力变得越夸张。如果在设计阶段不考虑这些微观应力,则会对挠曲造成严重影响。 IPC-2223柔性印刷电路板的截面设计标准包含最小弯曲半径的公式,但这些公式实际上更多地是针对柔性安装应用,而不是动态应用,如您所描述的那样。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Circuitree》 |2011年第1期|p.15|共1页
  • 作者

    Mark Finstad;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号