首页> 外文期刊>Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture >Ignatius of Antioch and the Parting of the Ways: Early Jewish–Christian Relations. By Thomas A. Robinson. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2009. xiv + 285 pp. $27.95 paper.
【24h】

Ignatius of Antioch and the Parting of the Ways: Early Jewish–Christian Relations. By Thomas A. Robinson. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2009. xiv + 285 pp. $27.95 paper.

机译:安提阿的伊格纳修斯(Ignatius)和道路的分离:早期的犹太人与基督教的关系。托马斯·鲁宾逊马萨诸塞州皮博迪市:亨德里克森,2009年。xiv+ 285页,27.95美元。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The author of The Bauer Thesis Examined: The Geography of Heresy in thenEarly Christian Church (Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen, 1988) and The EarlynChurch: An Annotated Bibliography of Literature in English (Methuen, N.J.:nScarecrow, 1993) contests here a series of views that are presented as recentnconsensuses. In particular, Robinson wants to demonstrate 1) that the notionnthat Ignatius was embroiled in dissension in the Antiochene church is offnbase and 2) that Ignatius represents a mainstream position when he radicallyndistinguishes Christianity from Judaism. “The primary concern here is tonshow where treatments of Ignatius need to be disregarded or refined, andnthereby to add to our understanding of the development of the early church”n(6). The tone of the entire book is, accordingly, contentious; documentationnfrom the secondary literature is extensive; argumentation is heavily hedged.
机译:《鲍尔论文的审查:当时基督教教堂的异端地理》(纽约州利维斯顿:爱德温·梅伦,1988年)和《早期教会:英语文学注释书目》(新泽西州梅特胡恩:nScarecrow,1993年)的作者表示为最近共识的观点。特别是,罗宾逊想证明1)伊格纳修斯在安提阿希涅教会中纠缠不休的观念已经不合时宜了; 2)伊格纳修斯从根本上区分基督教与犹太教时,代表了主流地位。 “这里最主要的问题是需要忽略或完善对伊格内修斯的治疗的坦索方式,从而加深我们对早期教会发展的了解” n(6)。因此,整本书的语气是有争议的。二手文献中的文献资料很丰富;争论被严重套期保值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号