首页> 外文期刊>Christian Bioethics >Is Europe, Along with its Bioethics, Still Christian? Or Already Post-Christian? Reflections on Traditional and Post-Enlightenment Christianities and Their Bioethics
【24h】

Is Europe, Along with its Bioethics, Still Christian? Or Already Post-Christian? Reflections on Traditional and Post-Enlightenment Christianities and Their Bioethics

机译:欧洲及其生物伦理学仍然是基督教吗?或者已经是后基督教徒?对传统和启蒙后的基督教及其生物伦理的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This introduction explores the relationship between Europe and its Christianities. It analyses different diagnostic and evaluative approaches to Europe's Christian or post-Christian identity. These are grouped around the concepts of diverse traditional, and, on the other hand, post-Enlightenment Christianities. While the first revolves around a liturgical and mystical account of the church, a Christ-centred humanism, an emphasis on man's future life, noetic theology and a foundationalist claim to universal truth, the second endorses a moralization of the “Christian message,” political implementation of “Christian goals,” rationalism, a this-worldly humanism, and tolerance for religious diversity. Since even the concepts of “traditional” and “post-Enlightenment” Christianity turn out to be deeply ambiguous, the essay concludes with exploring the different ways in which the Christianity of the Apostolic Church, the Enlightenment (along with the “Western” Christianities it shaped), and contemporary liberalism each conceive of their respective endorsements of human freedom as either normative, that is obligatory, value-laden, or contingent, and arbitrary. In each case, a different notion of “tradition” (as well as familial and church authority) is placed either in harmony or in opposition to such freedom. As a result of this conceptual analysis, the deeply fractured identity of Europe, as exemplified by the diverse bioethical positions adopted by the authors in this issue, becomes visible.
机译:本简介探讨了欧洲与其基督教之间的关系。它分析了对欧洲基督教徒或后基督教徒身份的不同诊断和评估方法。这些围绕着不同的传统概念,另一方面是启蒙后的基督教。前者围绕教会的礼拜仪式和神秘的叙述,以基督为中心的人文主义,强调人的未来生活,神学和基础主义者对普遍真理的主张,而后者围绕“基督教信息”的道德化,政治实施“基督教目标”,理性主义,超凡脱俗的人文主义以及对宗教多样性的容忍。由于甚至连“传统”和“启蒙后”基督教的概念都变得非常模棱两可,因此本文最后探讨了使徒教会的基督教,启蒙运动(以及“西方”基督教)的不同方式。形)和当代自由主义各自将各自对人类自由的认可视为规范性的,即强制性的,具有价值的或偶然性的,任意性的。在每种情况下,都将不同的“传统”概念(以及家族和教会权威)置于和谐之中或反对这种自由。作为这一概念分析的结果,人们看到了欧洲这一极为破碎的特征,这一点以作者在本期中采用的多种生物伦理立场为例。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Christian Bioethics》 |2008年第1期|p.1-28|共28页
  • 作者

    Corinna Delkeskamp-Hayes;

  • 作者单位

    International Studies in Philosophy and Medicine, Freigericht, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:14:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号