...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Medical Sciences Journal >OUTCOME OF POSTEROLATERAL FUSION VERSUS CIRCUMFERENTIAL FUSION WITH CAGE FOR LUMBAR STENOSIS AND LOW DEGREE LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS
【24h】

OUTCOME OF POSTEROLATERAL FUSION VERSUS CIRCUMFERENTIAL FUSION WITH CAGE FOR LUMBAR STENOSIS AND LOW DEGREE LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

机译:腰椎狭窄和低度腰椎滑脱的后侧融合与环行融合融合术的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective To evaluate the outcome of two methods for stabilization and fusion: posterolateral fusion and circumferential fusion involving posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar stenosis with Grades 1 and 2 lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From April 1998 to April 2003, 45 patients suffering from lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis treated in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed and assigned to two groups. Among them, 2.4 patients (group A) were treated with instrumented posterolateral fusion and 21 patients (group B) with instrumented circumferential fusion. The two groups were compared for clinical and radiological outcomes. Results All patients were followed up for 12 to 72 months. In group A, results showed preoperative clinical symptoms disappeared completely in 12 of 24 patients, and pain relief was seen in 91. 7% (22/24). Two cases suffered from residual symptoms. Twenty-two cases obtained complete reduction of olisthy vertebral bodies, and anatomical reduction rate was 91.7%. No infection or neurological complication occurred in this group. In group B, results showed preoperative clinical symptoms disappeared completely in 13 of 21 patients, and pain relief was seen in 90.5% (19/21). One case suffered from residual symptoms. Twenty cases obtained complete reduction of the olisthy vertebral bodies, and anatomical reduction rate was 95.2%. Four cases of infection or neurological complication occurred in this group. Both groups indicated no significant difference in clinical outcomes and anatomical reduction rate during follow-up. But group A had better intraoperative circumstances and postoperative outcome than group B, while group B had better postoperative parameters in X-ray of Angle of Slipping and Disc Index than group A. Conclusions The first choice of surgical method for lumbar stenosis with low degree lumbar spondylolisthesis is instrumented posterolateral fusion. Only when patients suffer from severe preoperative disc degeneration and low back pain or intervertebral instability should we consider indications for additional use of CAGE.
机译:目的评估后路外侧融合和周向融合(包括后路腰椎椎间融合术)治疗1级和2级腰椎滑脱的腰椎狭窄两种方法的效果。方法回顾性分析我院1998年4月至2003年4月收治的45例低度腰椎滑脱腰椎管狭窄症患者的临床资料,分为两组。其中,有2.4例患者(A组)接受了器械后外侧融合治疗,有21例患者(B组)接受了器械性圆周融合治疗。比较两组的临床和放射学结果。结果所有患者均获随访,时间12〜72个月。在A组中,结果显示24例患者中有12例术前临床症状完全消失,并且91. 7%的患者疼痛缓解(22/24)。 2例出现残余症状。 22例完全切除了橄榄石质椎体,解剖复位率为91.7%。该组未发生感染或神经系统并发症。在B组中,结果显示21例患者中的13例术前临床症状完全消失,并且90.5%(19/21)的患者疼痛得到缓解。 1例出现残余症状。完全切除骨质的20例,解剖复位率为95.2%。该组发生感染或神经系统并发症四例。两组均显示随访期间临床结局和解剖复位率无显着差异。但A组的术中情况和术后疗效优于B组,而B组的X线滑移角和椎间盘指数的术后参数优于A组。结论低度腰椎管狭窄症手术方法的首选腰椎滑脱是器械性后外侧融合。只有当患者术前出现严重的椎间盘退变,腰背痛或椎间不稳时,我们才考虑再次使用CAGE的适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号