首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Medical Journal >Comparative study of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease
【24h】

Comparative study of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease

机译:三支冠状动脉疾病患者的泵内和泵外冠状动脉搭桥手术的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Studies on selected patients undergoing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery have produced inconsistent results, especially in patients with multiple coronary artery disease. This study compared the clinical results of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in patients with triple-vessel disease. Methods A total of 300 consecutive isolated, multiple coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients were assigned to the off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB, n =150) or CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CCABG, n =150) groups. There were no significant differences regarding degree of angina, history of myocardial infarction or diabetes, and presence of left main coronary artery disease between the two groups. Ejection fraction in the OPCAB group before surgery was lower than in the CCABG group (P < 0.01). In addition, more patients had a history of stroke and abnormal renal function preoperatively in the OPCAB group(P< 0. 01). In OPCAB patients, single deep pericardial stay suture with a sling snared down was used to expose the target vessels, along with a stabilizer and a coronary shunt. A Medi-Stim Butterfly Flowmeter was used to measure blood flow through grafts in both groups. Results No OPCAB patient was converted to the CCABG group. The average numbers of distal anastomoses and the indexes of completeness of revascularization (ICR) were similar in both groups. Postoperative respiratory support time and the volumes of chest tube drainage and of blood transfusions were less in the OPCAB group than in the CCABG group (both P < 0. 01 ) . The postoperative incidences of pulmonary dysfunction and renal insufficiency were lower in the OPCAB group than in the CCABG group (both P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mortality and other causes of morbidity (periopetative myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation). Conclusions OPCAB can be applied to patients with triple-vessel coronary artery disease and can achieve similar completeness of revascularization and similar early surgical results, with shorter respiratory support, reduced transfusion requirement, and fewer cases of pulmonary dysfunction and abnormal renal function.
机译:背景技术对选择进行非体外循环泵与体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术的某些患者的研究结果不一致,尤其是在患有多发冠状动脉疾病的患者中。这项研究比较了三重血管疾病患者的泵内和泵外冠状动脉搭桥手术的临床结果。方法将300例连续的孤立,多次冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者分为非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB,n = 150)或行心肺搭桥术(CCABG,n = 150)的CABG组。两组之间在心绞痛程度,心肌梗塞或糖尿病史以及是否存在左主冠状动脉疾病方面无显着差异。术前OPCAB组的射血分数低于CCABG组(P <0.01)。此外,OPCAB组术前有中风病史和肾功能异常的患者(P <0。01)。在OPCAB患者中,将单根深层心包留缝缝合线与向下垂悬的吊索一起使用,以暴露目标血管,稳定器和冠状动脉分流器。使用Medi-Stim蝴蝶流量计测量两组中通过移植物的血流量。结果没有OPCAB患者被转为CCABG组。两组的远端吻合口平均数目和血运重建完全性(ICR)指标相似。 OPCAB组的术后呼吸支持时间,胸腔引流量和输血量均少于CCABG组(均P <0. 01)。 OPCAB组的术后肺功能障碍和肾功能不全的发生率低于CCABG组(均P <0.05)。两组在死亡率和其他发病率(持续性心肌梗塞,中风,心房颤动)之间无显着差异。结论OPCAB可用于三支冠状动脉疾病患者,具有相似的血运重建和早期手术效果,呼吸支持时间短,输血需求减少,肺功能障碍和肾功能异常的病例减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号