首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Medical Journal >Comparison of drug eluting stents with bare metal stents in daily practice for bifurcation lesions in Chinese patients
【24h】

Comparison of drug eluting stents with bare metal stents in daily practice for bifurcation lesions in Chinese patients

机译:药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在中国患者分叉病变日常实践中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Recently, numerous randomized and controlled trials have demonstrated great advantages of drug eluting stents (DES) with respect to significant reduction of restenosis and recurrence of symptoms and improvement of clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Little is known about the comparative effects between DES and bare metal stents (BMS) for bifurcation angioplasty in the Chinese population. We compared the inpatient and 7-month follow-up outcomes between DES and BMS for the treatment of bifurcation lesions. Methods From April 2004 to October 2005, 291 Chinese patients [85.9% male, mean age (57.8 ± 10.4) years] underwent DES (387 lesions) and/or BMS (297 lesions) implantation for bifurcation lesions. Clinical and angiographic follow-up was performed at 7 months. Results Compared with BMS group, patients in DES group had significantly lower rates of restenosis at main branch (9.5% vs 28.7%, P < 0.001) or side branch (14.5% vs 37.0%, P < 0.001) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (14.0% vs 26.3%, P = 0.000). The occurrence rate of late in-stent thrombosis did not differ between the two groups in both main (0.8% vs 0, P = 0.224) and side branches (1.4% vs 0, P = 0.198). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was less frequent in DES group for main branch (8.3% vs 21.3%, P < 0.001) and for side branch (7.6% vs 23.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that total stent length (OR = 1.029, P = 0.01), postprocedural in-stent minimum lumen diameter (OR = 0.476, P = 0.03) and stent type (OR = 3.988, P = 0.0001) were independent predictors of TLR for main branch. Prior history of coronary intervention (OR = 2.424, P = 0.041), angulated lesion (OR = 2.337, P = 0.033), postdilation (OR = 0.267, P = 0.035) and stent type (DES vs BMS, OR = 5.459, P = 0.000) were independent predictors of TLR for side branch. Conclusion The implantation of DES may be associated with greater reduction of restenosis and TLR than BMS in bifurcations angioplasty.
机译:背景技术最近,许多随机和对照试验证明了药物洗脱支架(DES)在显着减少再狭窄和症状复发以及改善经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后临床效果方面的巨大优势。关于DES和裸金属支架(BMS)在中国人群分叉血管成形术中的比较效果知之甚少。我们比较了DES和BMS在分叉病变中的住院和7个月随访结果。方法2004年4月至2005年10月,共有291例中国患者(男性占85.9%,平均年龄(57.8±10.4)岁)接受了DES(387处病灶)和/或BMS(297处病灶)植入术治疗分叉病变。在7个月时进行临床和血管造影随访。结果与BMS组相比,DES组患者的主要分支或主要分支不良心脏事件(9.5%vs 28.7%,P <0.001)或侧支(14.5%vs 37.0%,P <0.001)的再狭窄率显着降低。 MACE)(14.0%和26.3%,P = 0.000)。两组晚期支架内血栓形成的发生率在主要分支(0.8%vs. 0,P = 0.224)和侧支分支(1.4%vs. 0,P = 0.198)之间没有差异。 DES组主分支(8.3%vs 21.3%,P <0.001)和侧支(7.6%vs 23.5%,P <0.001)的靶病变血运重建术(TLR)较少。多元回归分析表明,支架总长度(OR = 1.029,P = 0.01),支架内术后最小管腔直径(OR = 0.476,P = 0.03)和支架类型(OR = 3.988,P = 0.0001)是以下因素的独立预测指标主分支的TLR。冠状动脉介入治疗的既往史(OR = 2.424,P = 0.041),病变角(OR = 2.337,P = 0.033),扩张后(OR = 0.267,P = 0.035)和支架类型(DES vs BMS,OR = 5.459,P = 0.000)是侧支TLR的独立预测因子。结论在分叉血管成形术中,DES植入可能比BMS减少再狭窄和TLR更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号