...
首页> 外文期刊>Chinese Journal of International Law >The Great Oxymoron: Jus In Bello Violations as Legitimate Non-Forcible Measures of Self-Defense: The Post-Disengagement Israeli Measures towards Gaza as a Case Study
【24h】

The Great Oxymoron: Jus In Bello Violations as Legitimate Non-Forcible Measures of Self-Defense: The Post-Disengagement Israeli Measures towards Gaza as a Case Study

机译:伟大的矛盾:违反贝洛的强制行为是合法的非强制性自卫措施:脱离接触后以色列对加沙的措施作为案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Modern warfare and the war on terror against mainly non-State actors have obliged States to resort to innovative measures which blur the limits between jus in bello and jus ad bellum and create a legal oxymoron where the same measures constitute international law violations should they be perceived under jus in bello and legitimate means of self-defense should they be seen under the lens of self-defense and jus ad bellum. In order to demonstrate the particular axiom the note will use the Israeli–Palestinian conflict as a factual and normative framework and will put under its kaleidoscope the post-disengagement Israeli measures towards Gaza.
机译:针对主要是非国家行为者的现代战争和反恐战争已迫使各国诉诸创新措施,这种措施模糊了在战争中的人与物权之间的界限,并产生了一种法律上的矛盾,认为这些措施构成违反国际法的行为应当以自卫和正当防卫的眼光来看待它们,并享有合法的自卫手段。为了说明这种特定的公理,该说明将以巴冲突作为事实和规范性框架,并将其撤离后以色列对加沙的措施置于万花筒之下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号