...
首页> 外文期刊>Chest >Comparison of Cardiac Output and Circulatory Blood Volumes by Transpulmonary Thermo-Dye Dilution and Transcutaneous Indocyanine Green Measurement in Critically Ill Patients
【24h】

Comparison of Cardiac Output and Circulatory Blood Volumes by Transpulmonary Thermo-Dye Dilution and Transcutaneous Indocyanine Green Measurement in Critically Ill Patients

机译:经肺热染料稀释法和经皮吲哚菁绿测量对重症患者心脏输出量和循环血容量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: We prospectively studied the agreement between transpulmonary aortic fiberoptic-based and pulse dye densitometry (PDD) measurements of cardiac output and circulatory blood volumes.nnDesign: Prospective clinical study.nnSetting: Operative ICU of a university hospital.nnPatients: Sixteen critically ill, deeply sedated patients receiving mechanical ventilation with ARDS (n = 8), sepsis/septic shock (n = 6), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 1), and severe head injury (n = 1).nnMeasurements and results: Each patient received a 4F aortic catheter with an integrated fiberoptic and thermistor that was connected to a computer system for automatic calculation of the transpulmonary indicator dilution (TPID) technique for the measurement of cardiac output (COTPID), intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV), and total blood volume measured by TPID technique (TBVTPID). In each patient, an indocyanine green sensor was attached to one nasal wing and connected to an analyzer for the PDD measurement of cardiac output (COPDD), central blood volume (CBV), and TBV measured by PDD (TBVPDD). For all first measurements, linear regression analysis between COTPID and COPDD revealed that COPDD = 0.63 × COTPID + 3.69 (L/min)[ r = 0.64, p = 0.008]. Mean bias between both techniques was − 0.8 L/min (SD, 1.7 L/min). Correlations between ITBV/CBV (r = 0.52) and TBVTPID/TBVPDD were only moderate: TBVPDD = 0.74 × TBVTPID + 2,362 (mL)[ r = 0.60, p = 0.015; mean bias, − 999 mL; SD, 1,353 mL]. Over all 55 measurements, TPID measurements were on average 11.5% (cardiac output) and 17.6% (TBV) higher than PDD measurements. The differences between both measurements ranged from − 58 to 81% (cardiac output) and from − 47 to 82% (TBV; 95% reference ranges). The main source of variation were the intraindividual differences, resulting in different peaks and trends in the patients’ time courses depending on which measurement method was used.nnConclusion: PDD measurement of cardiac output and circulatory blood volumes agrees moderately with transpulmonary thermo-dye dilution technique in critically ill patients.
机译:目的:我们前瞻性研究了基于肺动脉主动脉光纤和脉冲染料密度法(PDD)测量的心输出量和循环血量之间的一致性。nn设计:前瞻性临床研究。nn设置:某大学医院的手术ICU。nn患者:16名重症患者,深度镇静的患者接受ARDS机械通气(n = 8),败血症/败血性休克(n = 6),蛛网膜下腔出血(n = 1)和严重的颅脑损伤(n = 1).nn测量和结果:每位患者均接受了具有集成的光纤和热敏电阻的4F主动脉导管,该导管与计算机系统相连,用于自动计算经肺指示剂稀释(TPID)技术以测量心输出量(COTPID),胸腔内血容量(ITBV)和测得的总血容量通过TPID技术(TBVTPID)。在每位患者中,将吲哚菁绿传感器连接到一个鼻翼,并连接至分析仪,以通过PDD测量心输出量(COPDD),中心血容量(CBV)和通过PDD测量的TBV(TBVPDD)。对于所有首次测量,在COTPID和COPDD之间的线性回归分析显示COPDD = 0.63×COTPID + 3.69(L / min)[r = 0.64,p = 0.008]。两种技术之间的平均偏差为-0.8 L / min(标准偏差,1.7 L / min)。 ITBV / CBV(r = 0.52)与TBVTPID / TBVPDD之间的相关性中等:TBVPDD = 0.74×TBVTPID + 2,362(mL)[r = 0.60,p = 0.015;平均偏差-999 mL; SD,1,353 mL]。在全部55个测量中,TPID测量平均比PDD测量高11.5%(心输出量)和17.6%(TBV)。两次测量之间的差异介于-58至81%(心脏输出)和-47至82%(TBV; 95%参考范围)之间。变化的主要来源是个体差异,导致患者时程的峰值和趋势取决于所使用的测量方法。nn结论:PDD测量的心输出量和循环血量与经肺热染料稀释技术适度吻合在重症患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号