首页> 外文期刊>Chemosphere >Assessment of pesticide residues in army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and their potential consequences to foraging grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis)
【24h】

Assessment of pesticide residues in army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and their potential consequences to foraging grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis)

机译:评估大黄石公园生态系统中陆军飞蛾(Euxoa auxiliaris)中的农药残留及其对觅食灰熊(Ursus arctos horribilis)的潜在影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

During summer, a grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) (USA) can excavate and consume millions of army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) (ACMs) that aggregate in high elevation talus. Grizzly bears in the GYE were listed as threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service in 1975 and were proposed for delisting in 2005. However, questions remain about key bear foods. For example, ACMs are agricultural pests and concern exists about whether they contain pesticides that could be toxic to bears. Consequently, we investigated whether ACMs contain and transport pesticides to bear foraging sites and, if so, whether these levels could be toxic to bears. In 1999 we collected and analyzed ACMs from six bear foraging sites. ACMs were screened for 32 pesticides with gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD). Because gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) can be more sensitive than GC-ECD for certain pesticides, we revisited one site in 2001 and analyzed these ACMs with GC-MS/MS. ACMs contained trace or undetectable levels of pesticides in 1999 and 2001, respectively. Based on chemical levels in ACMs and numbers of ACMs a bear can consume, we calculated the potential of chemicals to reach physiological toxicity. These calculations indicate bears do not consume physiologically toxic levels of pesticides and allay concerns they are at risk from pesticides transported by ACMs. If chemical control of ACMs changes in the future, screening new ACM samples taken from bear foraging sites may be warranted. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在夏季,大黄石生态系统(GYE)(美国)的灰熊(Ursus arctos horribilis)可以挖掘并消耗数百万计在高距骨上聚集的陆生蛾(Euxoa auxiliaris)(ACM)。 GYE中的灰熊在1975年被美国鱼类和野生动物服务局列为威胁物种,并于2005年被提议除名。但是,关键熊食仍然存在疑问。例如,ACM是农业害虫,人们担心它们是否含有对熊有毒的农药。因此,我们调查了ACM是否包含农药并将农药运输到觅食地点,如果存在,这些水平是否对熊有毒。在1999年,我们从六个熊的觅食地点收集并分析了ACM。使用电子捕获检测(GC-ECD)气相色谱法对ACM筛选了32种农药。因为对于某些农药,气相色谱串联质谱法(GC-MS / MS)可能比GC-ECD更为灵敏,所以我们在2001年重新访问了一个地点,并用GC-MS / MS分析了这些ACM。 ACM中分别在1999年和2001年含有微量或未检出的农药。根据ACM中的化学物质含量和熊可以消耗的ACM数目,我们计算了化学物质达到生理毒性的潜力。这些计算表明,熊不消耗农药的生理毒性水平,并减轻了它们受到ACM运输的农药的威胁的担忧。如果将来对ACM的化学控制发生变化,则可能有必要筛选从熊类觅食地点采集的新ACM样品。 (c)2006 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号