...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemosphere >Short-term application of mulch, roundup and organic herbicides did not affect soil microbial biomass or bacterial and fungal diversity
【24h】

Short-term application of mulch, roundup and organic herbicides did not affect soil microbial biomass or bacterial and fungal diversity

机译:覆盖物,圆润和有机除草剂的短期应用不影响土壤微生物的生物量或细菌和真菌多样性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Application of synthetic herbicides is currently the most widely used and cost-effective methods to assist with revegetation programs. However, the effects of short-term application of herbicides such as Roundup, acetic acid, BioWeed (TM) and Slasher (R) as compared with mulch, on soil microbial biomass and microbial diversity remain unknown. This study examined the effects of short-term herbicide application on soil microbial biomass, C:N ratio, and fungal and bacterial communities at months 2 and 8 following initiation of treatment application. No effects of treatments on soil pH, C:N and microbial biomass were found. No segregation among treatments in the community structure of bacteria and fungi was observed. However, the fungal phylum Basiodiomycota had one unidentified class, which was only found in the mulch treatment, suggesting the C quality in the mulch treatment may differ compared with the other treatments. The dry and hot conditions experienced throughout the study period may have resulted in fast degradation of the herbicides and may have minimised the impacts of the herbicides on microbial diversity and community structure. Given that the research was undertaken at a single site and over only a short time frame, the results should be extrapolated with caution. Herbicides may have greater impact with long-term use. Future research will need to assess the revegetation success of each treatment and determine if the observed change in Basidiomycota profile and C quality identified in this study becomes significant over the long-term. We hypothesise that mulching may be a preferred treatment to facilitate weed control in riparian zone revegetation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:合成除草剂的应用是目前最广泛使用和具有成本效益的方法,以协助重新植入计划。然而,与覆盖物相比,在土壤微生物生物量和微生物多样性相比,除草剂如圆润,乙酸,生物纤维(TM)和Slasher(R)的短期应用的影响仍然未知。本研究检测了在治疗应用开始后2和8月2和8对土壤微生物化学生物量,C:N比和真菌和细菌群落的短期除草剂应用。发现治疗对土壤pH,C:N和微生物生物量的影响。观察到细菌和真菌的群落结构中的治疗中没有隔离。然而,真菌场嗜碱性霉菌具有一个未识别的类,其仅在覆盖物处理中发现,表明覆盖物治疗中的C质量可能与其他治疗相比不同。在整个研究期间经历的干燥和热条件可能导致除草剂的快速降解,并且可能使除草剂对微生物多样性和群落结构的影响最小化。鉴于该研究在单一站点进行,仅在短时间内进行,结果应谨慎推断。除草剂可能对长期使用产生更大的影响。未来的研究需要评估每种治疗的再培养成功,并确定本研究中发现的基础霉素概况和C质量的观察到的变化是否变得显着。我们假设覆盖物可能是一个优选的治疗方法,以促进河岸区再培养的杂草控制。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Chemosphere》 |2020年第4期|125436.1-125436.8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Sunshine Coast Genecol Res Ctr Maroochydore Qld 4558 Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Genecol Res Ctr Maroochydore Qld 4558 Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Genecol Res Ctr Maroochydore Qld 4558 Australia;

    Mary River Catchment Coordinating Comm POB 1027 Gympie Qld 4570 Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Genecol Res Ctr Maroochydore Qld 4558 Australia;

    Univ Melbourne Sch Agr & Food Parkville Vic 3010 Australia;

    Griffith Univ Sch Nat Sci Environm Futures Res Inst Brisbane Qld 4111 Australia;

    Univ Melbourne Sch Agr & Food Parkville Vic 3010 Australia;

    Dept Environm & Sci Landscape Sci POB 5078 Brisbane Qld 4001 Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Genecol Res Ctr Maroochydore Qld 4558 Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Genecol Res Ctr Maroochydore Qld 4558 Australia|Cent Queensland Univ Sch Hlth Med & Appl Sci Bundaberg Qld 4760 Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Soil fungi and bacteria; Organic herbicides; Acetic acid; BioWeed (TM); Roundup (R); Slasher (R); Glyphosate;

    机译:土壤真菌和细菌;有机除草剂;醋酸;BiOWEED(TM);圆形(R);Slasher(R);草甘膦;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号