首页> 外文期刊>Chemosphere >Assessment of leachates from reactive fire-retardant coatings by chemical analysis and ecotoxicity testing
【24h】

Assessment of leachates from reactive fire-retardant coatings by chemical analysis and ecotoxicity testing

机译:通过化学分析和生态毒性检测评估来自活性阻燃涂层的渗滤液

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The environmental compatibility of reactive fire-retardant coatings (intumescent paints) was investigated by a combination of leaching and ecotoxicological tests. Three representative fire-retardant coating systems were tested using two leaching procedures: "Horizontal Dynamic Surface Leaching Test" (DSLT) and the "Intermittent Immersion Test" (UT). All eluate fractions (8 for DSLT and 9 for IIT) were analyzed for pH, conductivity, concentration of total organic carbon and selected anions and cations. Additionally, a GC-MS screening of selected fractions was conducted for identification of organic compounds. Eluate fractions 1 + 2 and fraction 7 of the DSLT were analyzed in four ecotoxicological tests (algae, daphnia, fish egg, luminescent bacteria) and in one genotoxicity test (umu). Concentration of most analytes was rather low or below limit of detection for many eluates. Analytes detected in eluates of all three products are Zn, Ba, SO42- - and PO43-. Release patterns do not indicate a general trend: some compounds show maximum release in the first fractions while for others the maximum was observed in later test stages. Ecotoxic effects in eluates were found, which were higher in the eluate fraction 7 (maximum lowest ineffective dilution for luminescent bacteria (LIDL) 256) than in the eluate fraction 1 + 2 (maximum LIDL = 24). The sensitivity of the test systems was very different with highest effects for luminescent bacteria, followed by algae and daphnia and without effects in the fish egg test and umu test. A biotest battery for the comprehensive assessment is therefore advisable. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:通过浸出和生态毒理学试验的组合研究了活性阻燃涂层(膨胀料)的环境相容性。使用两种浸出程序测试三种代表性的阻燃涂层系统:“水平动态表面浸出试验”(DSLT)和“间歇性浸渍试验”(UT)。分析所有洗脱液(IIT和IIT的9个)的所有洗脱液,进行pH,电导率,总有机碳浓度和选定的阴离子和阳离子。另外,进行了所选级分的GC-MS筛选以鉴定有机化合物。在四种生态毒理学试验(藻类,Daphnia,鱼蛋,发光细菌中,在一种基因毒性试验(UMU)中分析了DSLT的洗脱液1 + 2和级分7。大多数分析物的浓度相当低或低于许多eluates的检测限。在所有三种产品的洗脱液中检测到的分析物是Zn,Ba,SO42-和PO43-。释放模式并不表示一般趋势:一些化合物显示在第一级分中的最大释放,而其他化合物在后面的测试阶段观察到最大值。发现eluates中的生态毒性效果,在洗脱液7中较高(发光菌细菌(Lid1)256的最大最低无效稀释度),而不是在洗脱液1 + 2中(最大Lid1 = 24)。测试系统的敏感性与发光细菌的最高效果非常不同,其次是藻类和Daphnia,并且没有在鱼卵试验和UMU测试中的影响。因此,可以建议进行全面评估的热电池。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号