首页> 外文期刊>Chemical health & safety >Beryllium: Hazards evaluation, facility classification, consequence analysis of releases during potential accidents, and protection of public and workers
【24h】

Beryllium: Hazards evaluation, facility classification, consequence analysis of releases during potential accidents, and protection of public and workers

机译:铍:危害评估,设施分类,潜在事故中排放物的后果分析以及对公众和工人的保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Comprehensive literature searches on beryllium (Be) and information on the particle size distribution of Be powder (Mishima et al.) indicate that the new airborne release fraction/respirable fraction (ARF/RF) values for large coherent pieces, turnings/swarfs, chips/powder, and dust are several orders of magnitude lower for explosion, fire, and spill (e.g., 1E-2,1.5E-5, 1E-6) than earlier estimates based on DOE-HDBK-3010.3 This implies a lower consequence exposure and thus an increase in threshold limit or lower facility hazard classification (High-Moderate-Low), and less risk of exposure to workers and public during these accident scenarios. This is demonstrated by a case study of using 100 lbs chips/powder under various accident conditions (explosion, fire, and spill) in standard terrain (rural) and city terrain (urban) to assess the relative concentrations to a receptor at different distances, using EPIcode (Emergency Prediction Information Code) dispersion model.rnBeryllium aerosol exposure can cause: (1) acute exposure (short term) from Emergency Response Planning Guideline-3, -2 (ERPG-3, -2) levels; and (2) chronic (long term) from sensitization and chronic beryllium disease (CBD). Per 40 CFR 61.32, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Be emission standard limit to protect the public (no CBD) is 0.01 μg/m~3 on a 30-day time weighted average (TWA). Facility hazard classifications require modeling to be performed to establish a distance beyond which the public is protected. A case study using 100 lbs chip/powder release with conservative assumptions (e.g., standard, term release) shows that the public is protected beyond 200 m.rnThe American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) adopted exposure threshold limit value for workers at 2.0 μg/m~3, based on 8-hr TWA. However, 10 CFR 850 Rule on CBD and Prevention Program requires a protection at 0.2 μg/m~3 (8 h TWA), to further mitigate or prevent any health effects or CBD. Thus, 40 CFR 61.32, ACGIH and OSHA guide, and 10 CFR 850 Rule, coupled with the worker protection program and adequate safety controls, provide adequate protection from the CBD to the workers and public.
机译:有关铍(Be)和Be粉末粒度分布信息的全面文献搜索(Mishima等人)表明,大的连贯件,车削/切屑,碎屑的新的空气传播释放比例/可呼吸比例(ARF / RF)值粉末,粉尘和爆炸,火灾和溢出物(例如1E-2、1.5E-5、1E-6)的粉尘比基于DOE-HDBK-3010.3的早期估计要低几个数量级。这意味着较低的后果暴露量因此,在这些事故场景中,阈值限制的增加或设施危害分类的降低(高-中-低),以及降低了工人和公众暴露的风险。一项案例研究证明了这一点,该案例研究是在标准地形(农村)和城市地形(城市)的各种事故情况(爆炸,火灾和溢出)下使用100磅碎屑/粉末来评估不同距离下受体的相对浓度, rn铍气溶胶接触可能导致:(1)紧急响应计划指南-3,-2(ERPG-3,-2)的急性暴露(短期); (2)致敏和慢性铍病(CBD)引起的慢性(长期)。根据40 CFR 61.32,在30天时间加权平均值(TWA)中,环境保护局(EPA)的保护公众排放标准限值(无CBD)为0.01μg/ m〜3。设施危害分类要求进行建模,以建立保护公众的距离。一项使用100磅碎屑/粉末释放并带有保守假设(例如标准释放,术语释放)的案例研究表明,公众受到保护的范围超过了200 m。美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)和职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)基于8小时的TWA,工人采用的暴露阈限值为2.0μg/ m〜3。但是,《 CBD和预防计划10 CFR 850规则》要求保护浓度为0.2μg/ m〜3(TWA 8小时),以进一步减轻或预防任何健康影响或CBD。因此,40 CFR 61.32,ACGIH和OSHA指南以及10 CFR 850规则,再加上工人保护计划和适当的安全控制,为从CBD向工人和公众提供了充分的保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号