首页> 外文期刊>Central European History >Terror and Toleration: The Habsburg Empire Confronts Islam, 1526–1850. By Paula Sutter Fichtner. London: Reaktion Books. 2008. Pp. 205. Cloth $45.00. £25.00. ISBN 978-1-86189-340-6.
【24h】

Terror and Toleration: The Habsburg Empire Confronts Islam, 1526–1850. By Paula Sutter Fichtner. London: Reaktion Books. 2008. Pp. 205. Cloth $45.00. £25.00. ISBN 978-1-86189-340-6.

机译:恐怖与宽容:哈布斯堡帝国面对伊斯兰,1526-1850年。宝拉·萨特·菲希特纳(Paula Sutter Fichtner)。伦敦:Reaktion书。 2008年。 205.布料$ 45.00。 £25.00。 ISBN 978-1-86189-340-6。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is considerable and growing interest in western perceptions of thenOttomans and of Islam in early modern Europe. The lively contributionnreviewed here concentrates on the cultural and ideological dimension to thenclash between the Austrian Habsburg and Ottoman empires. The first partninvestigates attitudes in the Habsburg monarchy toward the Ottomans andnIslam from the early sixteenth to the late seventeenth centuries. Much hasnalready been published on the central European construction of “the Turk”nand his religion as the personification of evil and the antithesis of Christianity.nThe universalist pretensions of the Holy Roman imperial title held by the Habs-nburgs, and the claims of the Ottoman sultanate, left little room for mutual rec-nognition. Political rivalry was underpinned by theology, since both Christianitynand Islam claimed to represent singular, exclusive truths. Fichtner adds detail tonthe Habsburg perspective, especially on the fashioning of their image as innocentnvictims of Ottoman aggression that ran parallel to the better-known argumentsnadvanced in Lutheran Germany of the Turks as the scourge of God, sent tonpunish Christian sinners. Attitudes were far from uniform. A minority of schol-nars continued the earlier Humanist interest in the Islamic world and werenwilling to recognize positive features within Ottoman culture. Economic andndiplomatic exchange persisted with varying intensity. The view remained over-nwhelmingly negative, however, dominated by notions of Ottoman treacherynand brutality. These sentiments were deliberately fostered by the Habsburgs to mobilize support against what was often considered a superior enemy. One ofnthe most significant points to emerge from this part of the discussion is Fichtner’snconclusion that the strident and often shrill tone of Habsburg propagandanreflected their underlying fear that their military inferiority might end in defeat.
机译:现代西方对西方对当时的奥斯曼帝国和伊斯兰教的看法越来越感兴趣。这里所回顾的生动贡献集中在奥地利哈布斯堡王朝与奥斯曼帝国之间的冲突的文化和意识形态层面。第一部分调查了16世纪初至17世纪末哈布斯堡王朝对奥斯曼帝国和伊斯兰教的态度。关于中欧在“土耳其人”中的结构及其作为邪恶的化身和基督教的对立面的宗教,已经有许多文献发表过。苏丹国,相互承认的空间很小。政治竞争是神学的基础,因为基督教和伊斯兰教都声称代表着唯一的真理。菲希特纳(Fichtner)在哈布斯堡王朝的观点上增加了细节,特别是在他们的形象塑造成奥斯曼帝国侵略的无辜受害者的同时,这种现象与土耳其路德教德国人以上帝的祸害所引起的较著名的论点相平行,这使不讲教条的基督徒犯罪者受到了打击。态度远非统一。少数学者们继续了早期的人道主义主义者对伊斯兰世界的兴趣,并愿意承认奥斯曼文化中的积极特征。经济和外交往来以不同的强度持续着。但是,这一观点仍然是绝大多数的否定意见,主要是奥斯曼帝国背叛和残酷的观念。这些情绪是哈布斯堡王朝蓄意培养出来的,以动员人们对通常被认为是上级敌人的支持。讨论的这一部分出现的最重要的观点之一是费希特纳的结论,即哈布斯堡王朝宣传的刺耳且经常刺耳的语调反映了他们对自己的军事劣势可能以失败而告终的潜在恐惧。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Central European History》 |2009年第2期|p.341-343|共3页
  • 作者

    Peter H. Wilson;

  • 作者单位

    UNIVERSITY OF HULL;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:00:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号