...
首页> 外文期刊>Cell and Tissue Banking >Decontamination of heart valve and arterial allografts in the European Homograft Bank (EHB): comparison of two different antibiotic cocktails in low temperature conditions
【24h】

Decontamination of heart valve and arterial allografts in the European Homograft Bank (EHB): comparison of two different antibiotic cocktails in low temperature conditions

机译:欧洲同种异体移植银行(EHB)对心脏瓣膜和动脉同种异体移植物的净化:低温条件下两种不同抗生素混合物的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of two different antibiotic cocktails in the cardiovascular allograft decontamination. Low temperature, low-concentration antibiotic cocktail with Cefoxitin, Lincomycin, Polymixin B and Vancomycin was decontamination protocol in EHB for many years. The modified cocktail doesn’t contain Cefoxitin. The study had two steps. First step: cardiovascular allografts from 80 donors are incubated in classical (group 1) or modified cocktail (group 2). Second step: 184 and 182 allografts of group 1 and group 2 are incubated in the modified and classical antibiotic cocktail, respectively. The bacteriological examination is performed in three steps: A–transport solution, B–decontamination solution and C–cryopreservation solution. During the first step 23.75% of the tissues were initially contaminated mainly with Staphylococcus (78.95%). 93.75% of the allografts of group 1 and 100% of group 2 were sterile after incubation (p = 0.058). 25.54% and 30.77% of group 1 and 2, respectively were contaminated in A-examination during the second step. Staphylococci were isolated in 82.98% and 69.64% in group 1 and 2, respectively. About 4.35% of group 1 and 5.5% of group 2 were contaminated in A, B, and C whereas 5.4% of group 1 and 4.4% of group 2 were contaminated in B or C after being sterile in A. Finally 9.78% of the tissues were rejected and 90.22% cryopreserved in the modified, whereas 9.89% rejected and 90.11% accepted in the classical group (p = 0.1). The difference was non-significant in the level of decontamination between the two cocktails. Contamination of some tissues with low growing, low-pathogen germs that appeared in B or C examination, couldn’t be explained. This issue needs complementary investigation.
机译:该研究的目的是比较两种不同的抗生素混合物在心血管同种异体移植物净化中的效率。与头孢西丁,林可霉素,Polymixin B和万古霉素一起使用的低温,低浓度抗生素鸡尾酒在EHB中已被净化多年。改性鸡尾酒不含头孢西丁。该研究分两个步骤。第一步:将来自80个供体的心血管同种异体移植物在经典(第1组)或改良鸡尾酒(第2组)中孵育。第二步:分别在改良和经典抗生素混合物中孵育第1组和第2组的184和182同种异体移植物。细菌学检查分为三个步骤:A-运输溶液,B-去污溶液和C-冷冻保存溶液。在第一步中,23.75%的组织最初主要被葡萄球菌污染(78.95%)。温育后,第1组的93.75%和第2组的100%是无菌的(p = 0.058)。在第二步的A检验中,第1组和第2组的25.54%和30.77%被污染。在第1组和第2组中,葡萄球菌的分离率分别为82.98%和69.64%。在A,B和C中无菌后,第1组的4.35%和第2组的5.5%被A,B和C污染,而第1组的5.4%和第2组的4.4%在A中被消毒后被B或C污染。最后,9.78%在改良组中,组织被拒绝,且冷冻保存的比例为90.22%,而在经典组中则为9.89%,接受的比例为90.11%(p = 0.1)。两种鸡尾酒之间的去污水平差异不显着。无法解释在B或C检查中出现的一些生长缓慢,病原体低的细菌的组织污染。此问题需要补充调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号