首页> 外文期刊>CEAS Aeronautical Journal >A unified flight phase and event model for the analysis of heterogeneous ATM simulations
【24h】

A unified flight phase and event model for the analysis of heterogeneous ATM simulations

机译:统一的飞行阶段和事件模型,用于异构ATM仿真分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The research activities of the DLR Institute of Flight Guidance include validation and verification of new systems and procedures, such as airport infrastructure, routes, or assistance systems for air traffic controllers and pilots. Research is supported by a number of different simulation environments. Real-time simulators (RTS) like the Apron and Tower Simulator or the Air Traffic Management and Operations Simulator, as well as several fast-time simulation (FTS) tools focus on different parts of air traffic and help to examine various aspects of the air traffic environment (e.g. controller view, pilot view, general traffic situation, etc.). The utilization of all simulation systems in the Institute of Flight Guidance is focused on scientific research, and thus significant effort is placed in the analysis of simulation results. To support this task, the Institute of Flight Guidance has implemented the software system Extensible Workflow Management for Simulations (EWMS) for simulation process and data management. EWMS supports most of the simulation environments used within the institute, and provides generic reporting algorithms independent of the simulation system used. As the different simulation environments use a wide range of output data types and formats, the simulated flight trajectories have to be converted into one common format for subsequent analysis using the generic algorithms built into EWMS. Therefore, a unified description of flight phases and flight events was developed based on the CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team (CICTT) Phase of Flight Definitions (see Stepens and de Kock in Phase of flight definitions and usage notes, CAST/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team, Version 1.0.2, 2010) as well as flight event definitions from the EUROCONTROL CDM Implementation Manual (see Lagios in Airport CDM implementation manual, 2006), and taking into account the flight phase and event models of different simulation environments. A survey of the simulation environments used in the institute resulted in an initial set of flight phases that could be generated by the different simulators. These flight phases were mapped onto the CAST/ICAO definitions, and extensions were made where the CAST/ICAO model offered no corresponding flight phase. Conditions for each phase of flight (e.g., departure boarding, taxi to runway, initial climb, etc.) were documented. Similarly, conditions for the different flight events (e.g., estimated and actual landing time, estimated and actual in-block-time, etc.) and their relation to flight phase boundaries were defined and documented. The resulting unified flight phase and event model was validated through interviews with ATM and simulation experts, air traffic controllers, flight test engineers and pilots. Finally, the model was implemented within the EWMS parsers for the simulation-specific data files. To account for the different capabilities of different simulation environments, the model offers several levels of detail for the individual flight phases, e.g., where one environment may simply show an aircraft that has just taken off as "in flight", another environment can provide more detailed information about initial climb, climb to cruise and en-route flight. The flight phase model accounts for the different levels of detail to enable meaningful comparisons between the different simulations. The generic flight phase and event model enables the implementation of simulation-independent algorithms for the institute's heterogeneous ATM simulation environments, allowing comparative analyses for simulations from different environments (e.g., FTS and RTS). In turn, using the same well-validated algorithms for several environments significantly reduces the effort required for the analysis of individual simulation campaigns.
机译:DLR飞行指导研究所的研究活动包括对新系统和程序的验证和检验,例如机场基础设施,航线或空中交通管制员和飞行员的辅助系统。许多不同的仿真环境为研究提供了支持。实时仿真器(RTS)(如停机坪和塔式仿真器或空中交通管理和运营仿真器)以及一些快速仿真(FTS)工具专注于空中交通的不同部分,并有助于检查空中的各个方面交通环境(例如,管制员视图,飞行员视图,一般交通情况等)。飞行指导学院中所有模拟系统的利用都集中在科学研究上,因此在分析模拟结果方面投入了大量精力。为了支持该任务,飞行指导学院已经实施了用于仿真过程和数据管理的软件系统可扩展仿真工作流管理(EWMS)。 EWMS支持研究所内部使用的大多数仿真环境,并提供独立于所使用仿真系统的通用报告算法。由于不同的模拟环境使用多种输出数据类型和格式,因此必须使用EWMS内置的通用算法将模拟的飞行轨迹转换为一种通用格式,以便进行后续分析。因此,根据CAST / ICAO通用分类团队(CICTT)的飞行定义阶段,制定了飞行阶段和飞行事件的统一描述(请参阅CAST / ICAO通用分类团队的飞行定义和使用说明中的Stepens和de Kock)。 ,版本1.0.2,2010)以及EUROCONTROL CDM实施手册中的飞行事件定义(请参阅Lagios in Airport CDM实施手册,2006),并考虑了不同模拟环境的飞行阶段和事件模型。对研究所使用的模拟环境进行的调查得出了一组初始的飞行阶段,这些阶段可以由不同的模拟器生成。这些飞行阶段被映射到CAST / ICAO定义上,并且在CAST / ICAO模型没有提供相应飞行阶段的地方进行了扩展。记录了每个飞行阶段的条件(例如,登机登机,滑行至跑道,初始爬升等)。类似地,定义并记录了不同飞行事件的条件(例如,估计和实际着陆时间,估计和实际在座时间等)及其与飞行阶段边界的关系。通过与ATM和模拟专家,空中交通管制员,飞行测试工程师和飞行员的访谈,验证了最终的统一飞行阶段和事件模型。最后,该模型在EWMS解析器中针对特定于仿真的数据文件实现。为了考虑不同模拟环境的不同功能,该模型为各个飞行阶段提供了多个详细级别,例如,在一个环境中可能仅显示刚起飞的飞机“飞行中”,而另一个环境则可以提供更多详细信息有关初始爬升,爬升巡航和途中飞行的详细信息。飞行阶段模型考虑了详细程度的不同,从而可以在不同的模拟之间进行有意义的比较。通用的飞行阶段和事件模型可以为研究所的异构ATM仿真环境实现独立于仿真的算法,从而可以对来自不同环境(例如FTS和RTS)的仿真进行比较分析。反过来,在多个环境中使用相同的经过验证的算法,可以大大减少分析单个模拟活动所需的工作量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号