【24h】

Ask the Right Questions, and You'll Get a Better Answer: How Training in the Philosophy of Mission Command Will Enable Our Commanders to Get Staffs to Get It Right the First Time

机译:提出正确的问题,您会得到一个更好的答案:特派团指挥哲学中的培训如何使我们的指挥官能够使人员在第一时间得到正确的解决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In his 2012 book, Bleeding Talent, economist Tim Kane uses the example of retired GEN David Petraeus to illustrate how the global war on terrorism has exposed a failing in the Army's leader-development systems. Kane states that Petraeus' relative demotion from U.S. Central Command commander to commander of the United States' effort in Afghanistan in 2010 "is something to interpret very positively for the man and very negatively for the institution." Former Marine officer Renny McPherson similarly asks why no other generals were available to take the top job in Afghanistan. McPherson concludes that the U.S. military "had failed to produce enough leaders like Petraeus." Both these men use the Petraeus example to argue that the Army needs to improve its capacity to grow top leaders to win the nation's wars.
机译:经济学家蒂姆·凯恩(Tim Kane)在2012年出版的《流血的人才》(Bleeding Talent)一书中,以退休的戴维·彼得雷乌斯(David David Petraeus)将军为例,说明全球反恐战争如何暴露了陆军领导人发展系统的失败。凯恩指出,比雷埃夫斯在2010年从美国中央司令部司令官降级为美国在阿富汗的行动司令官,“对于这个人来说,这是非常积极的解释,而对于这个机构,则是非常负面的解释。”前海军陆战队官员麦克尼森(Renny McPherson)同样问,为什么没有其他将军可以担任阿富汗的最高职务。麦克弗森得出的结论是,美国军方“未能培养出像彼得雷乌斯这样的足够领导人”。这两个人都以彼得雷乌斯为例,认为陆军需要提高其培养高级领导人的能力,才能赢得国家战争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号