...
首页> 外文期刊>CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology >Embolization of the Gastroduodenal Artery Before Selective Internal Radiotherapy: A Prospectively Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Pushable Coils with Fibered Interlock Detachable Coils
【24h】

Embolization of the Gastroduodenal Artery Before Selective Internal Radiotherapy: A Prospectively Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Pushable Coils with Fibered Interlock Detachable Coils

机译:选择性十二指肠内放疗前胃十二指肠动脉的栓塞:前瞻性比较标准可推式线圈与纤维联锁可分离式线圈的随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was compare embolization of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) using standard pushable coils with the Interlock detachable coil (IDC), a novel fibered mechanically detachable long microcoil, in patients scheduled for selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Fifty patients (31 male and 19 female; median age 66.6 ± 8.1 years) were prospectively randomized for embolization using either standard coils or IDCs. Procedure time, radiation dose, number of embolization devices, complications, and durability of vessel occlusion at follow-up angiography were recorded. The procedures differed significantly in time (14:32 ± 5:56 min for standard coils vs. 2:13 ± 1:04 min for IDCs; p < 0.001); radiation dose for coil deployment (2479 ± 1237 cGycm² for standard coils vs. 275 ± 268 cGycm² for IDCs; p < 0.001); and vessel occlusion (17:18 ± 6:39 min for standard coils vs. 11:19 ± 7:54 min for IDCs; p = 0.002). A mean of 6.2 ± 1.8 coils (n = 27) were used in the standard coil group, and 1.3 ± 0.9 coils (p < 0.0001) were used in the IDC group (n = 23) because additional pushable coils were required to achieve GDA occlusion in 4 patients. In 2 patients, the IDC could not be deployed through a Soft-VU catheter. One standard coil dislodged in the hepatic artery and was retrieved. Vessel reperfusion was noted in only 1 patient in the standard coil group. Controlled embolization of the GDA with fibered IDCs was achieved more rapidly than with pushable coils. However, vessel occlusion may not be obtained using a single device only, and the use of sharply angled guiding catheters hampered coil pushability.
机译:这项研究的目的是在计划进行选择性内部放疗(SIRT)的患者中,使用标准可推动线圈与Interlock可分离线圈(IDC)(一种新型的纤维可机械分离的长微线圈)对胃十二指肠动脉(GDA)的栓塞进行比较。使用标准线圈或IDC对50例患者(男31例,女19例;中位年龄66.6±8.1岁)进行栓塞术。记录手术时间,放射剂量,栓塞装置的数量,并发症以及在后续血管造影时血管闭塞的耐久性。程序的时间差异很大(标准线圈为14:32±5:56分钟,而IDC为2:13±1:04分钟; p <0.001);线圈部署的辐射剂量(标准线圈为2479±1237cGycm²,而IDC为275±268cGycm²; p <0.001);和血管闭塞(标准线圈为17:18±6:39分钟,而IDC为11:19±7:54分钟; p = 0.002)。标准线圈组平均使用6.2±1.8个线圈(n = 27),IDC组平均使用1.3±0.9个线圈(p <0.0001)(n = 23),因为需要额外的可推动线圈才能达到GDA阻塞4例。在2例患者中,无法通过Soft-VU导管部署IDC。一根标准线圈在肝动脉中脱落并被收回。在标准线圈组中,仅1名患者出现了血管再灌注。与可推动线圈相比,使用纤维状IDC来控制GDA的栓塞控制更快。然而,仅使用单个装置可能无法获得血管闭塞,并且锐角引导导管的使用阻碍了线圈的推动性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号