...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Biomarkers >SELDI-TOF MS serum protein profiles in breast cancer: Assessment of robustness and validity
【24h】

SELDI-TOF MS serum protein profiles in breast cancer: Assessment of robustness and validity

机译:乳腺癌SELDI-TOF MS血清蛋白谱:稳健性和有效性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is an urgent need for new serum markers that can be applied in e.g. the early detection of breast cancer. Following detection of new, potential biomarkers, such as those reported by Vlahou et al. (Clin Breast Cancer 2003;4:230-239) and Laronga et al. (Dis Markers 2003;19:229-238), assessment of both their robustness and validity is essential to confirm their clinical applicability. We therefore aimed to determine robustness and validity of biomarkers reported by the authors mentioned, by analysis of an independent sample set (breast cancer: n=47, normal women: n=45) in our laboratory, according to the methods described by both authors. Although all markers for the differentiation between breast cancer patients and normal women, discovered in the study of Vlahou et al., were recovered in our validation data set, none had sufficient performance to be applied as a classifier. The markers discovered by Laronga et al. in the differentiation between lymph node positive and -negative breast cancer patients were in part recovered from our validation data set, but were also not applicable as a classifier. In conclusion, although (part of) the proteins discovered and designated as markers by either author could be detected, their validity as biomarkers could not be confirmed by the current study. This finding stresses that, when reporting on a potential biomarker, confirmation of both robustness and validity is essential in obtaining its true clinical applicability.
机译:迫切需要可用于例如血清中的新的血清标志物。早期发现乳腺癌。在检测到新的潜在生物标记后,例如Vlahou等报道的那些。 (Clin Breast Cancer 2003; 4:230-239)和Laronga等。 (Dis Markers 2003; 19:229-238),评估其健壮性和有效性对于确认其临床适用性至关重要。因此,我们旨在根据两位作者描述的方法,通过分析实验室中的独立样本集(乳腺癌:n = 47,正常女性:n = 45),确定上述作者报告的生物标志物的稳健性和有效性。 。尽管在Vlahou等人的研究中发现了所有区分乳腺癌患者和正常女性的标志物,但在我们的验证数据集中均已将其回收,但没有一个足以用作分类器的性能。 Laronga等人发现的标记。淋巴结阳性和阴性乳腺癌患者之间的差异部分是从我们的验证数据集中获得的,但也不适用于分类。总之,尽管可以检测到由任一作者发现并指定为标记物的蛋白质(的一部分),但当前的研究无法确定其作为生物标记物的有效性。这一发现强调,当报告潜在的生物标志物时,对鲁棒性和有效性的确认对于获得其真正的​​临床适用性至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cancer Biomarkers 》 |2006年第6期| 235-248| 共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Clinical Chemistry, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Biomarkers; robustness; validity; SELDI-TOF MS; breast cancer;

    机译:生物标志物;健壮性有效性SELDI-TOF MS;乳腺癌;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号