Pettipas v. Bell Aliant Regional Communications Inc.

摘要

Edna Pettipas makes subjective complaints and therefore her credibility may be in issue. Nonetheless, there is objective evidence in the form of expert reports, to support the plaintiffs' allegations. However, the facts relied on by Dr. Havas' in coming to her conclusions as well as the weight to be given to Dr. Havas' testimony will be issues for trial. Dr. Bouchard and Dr. Fox rely in part on the opinion and report of Dr. Havas. Therefore, the weight to be given to Dr. Bouchard's and Dr. Fox's opinions may be in issue. The potential health risks associated with cell tower emissions may be at issue at trial. Bell Aliant's knowledge of the potential health risks associated with cell tower emissions at relevant times may also be in issue.