...
首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics >Has the Emphasis on Autonomy Gone Too Far? Insights from Dostoevsky on Parental Decisionmaking in the NICU
【24h】

Has the Emphasis on Autonomy Gone Too Far? Insights from Dostoevsky on Parental Decisionmaking in the NICU

机译:对自主权的重视已经过头了吗?陀思妥耶夫斯基对重症监护病房父母决策的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a recent essay, George Annas, the legal columnist for The New England Journal of Medicine, observed that the resuscitation of extremely premature infants, even over parental objection, is not problematic because "once the child's medical status has been determined, the parents have the legal authority to make all subsequent decisions." Annas himself is quick to concede that treatment in a high-technology neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) frequently takes on a life of its own. He also acknowledges that although bioethicists and courts agree that there is no ethical or legal difference between withholding or withdrawing a respirator from a patient, parents and physicians find the withdrawal much more emotionally troubling.
机译:《新英格兰医学杂志》的法律专栏作家乔治·安纳斯(George Annas)在最近的一篇文章中指出,即使由于父母的反对,对极早产婴儿进行复苏也不成问题,因为“一旦确定了孩子的医疗状况,父母就会作出所有后续决定的法定权力。” Annas本人很快就承认,在高科技新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中进行的治疗常常会自己丧命。他还承认,尽管生物伦理学家和法院同意,从患者身上扣留或撤回呼吸器之间在道德或法律上没有区别,但父母和医生发现撤回在情感上造成更大的麻烦。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号