首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge journal of economics >Can working and employment conditions in the personal services sector be improved?
【24h】

Can working and employment conditions in the personal services sector be improved?

机译:个人服务部门的工作和就业条件是否可以改善?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Personal services have attracted considerable attention from policy makers in France, with a view to achieving two objectives: creating jobs and reintegrating those individuals furthest removed from the labour market. Attempts to achieve these objectives have tended to emphasise job quantity at the expense of job quality, which, despite the avowed efforts of employers and regulators, remains poor. How can this discrepancy be explained? The article analyses the series of mechanisms at work. While some of these mechanisms are the same as those at work in all personal services, others vary according to the activity in question. Care activities, for example, are caught up in a 'vicious circle', while those employed in domestic services are caught in a 'precarity trap'. The fact that these two areas of activity belong to different 'worlds of production' means that the prospects for improving job quality are greater in one (care activities) than in the other.
机译:个人服务引起了法国政策制定者的极大关注,以实现两个目标:创造就业机会和使那些最远离劳动力市场的人重新融入社会。试图实现这些目标的做法倾向于强调工作量,而牺牲工作质量,尽管雇主和监管机构作出了巨大努力,但工作质量仍然很差。如何解释这种差异?本文分析了一系列工作机制。尽管其中一些机制与所有个人服务中使用的机制相同,但其他机制根据所讨论的活动而有所不同。例如,护理活动陷入了“恶性循环”,而家政服务业者陷入了“危险圈套”。这两个活动领域属于不同的“生产世界”这一事实意味着,一种(护理活动)改善工作质量的前景比另一种更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号