...
首页> 外文期刊>Business Economics >The Myths and Facts of Patent Troll and Excessive Payment: Have Nonpracticing Entities (NPEs) Been Qvercompensated?
【24h】

The Myths and Facts of Patent Troll and Excessive Payment: Have Nonpracticing Entities (NPEs) Been Qvercompensated?

机译:专利巨魔和超额付款的神话与事实:非执业实体(NPE)是否已获得Qvercompensated?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

"Nonpracticing entities" (NPEs) own patents but do not practice the patented technologies. They are sometimes referred to as "patent trolls," who hold up practicing companies to seek exorbitant payments. This paper conducts a review of the theoretical literature, which is inconclusive on whether NPEs have been systematically overcompensated. This study offers the first empirical study in license royalty rates, and its econometric analysis demonstrates that NPEs have not been overcompensated in license markets, regardless of whether other relevant variables are controlled. This conclusion is then put back into the larger context of NPE economics to lay out topics for further research through cross-examining other major conclusions in this field.
机译:“非执业实体”(NPE)拥有专利,但不实践专利技术。它们有时被称为“专利巨魔”,它们持有执业公司以寻求高额付款。本文对理论文献进行了回顾,这对于NPE是否被系统地过度补偿尚无定论。这项研究提供了有关许可使用费率的第一项实证研究,其计量经济学分析表明,无论是否控制了其他相关变量,NPE在许可市场上并未得到过高的补偿。然后将该结论放回到NPE经济学的更大背景下,通过交叉审视该领域的其他主要结论,为进一步研究奠定基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号