...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists >The Last Word: March madness
【24h】

The Last Word: March madness

机译:最后一句话:三月的疯狂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

When the true contents of the new nuclear Posture Review (NPR) were revealed in early March, the Bush administration's official response was as confused and counterproductive as the document itself. The January 2002 review explicitly cites Iraq, Iran, Libya, North Korea, and Syria―in addition to China and Russia―claiming that there are a variety of "immediate" and potential contingencies that might require the use of nuclear weapons against them. Many of the review's "scenarios" do not even involve the use of nuclear weapons by these countries. And two of the review's three most prominent scenarios―a Chinese attack on Taiwan and an Iraqi attack on Israel or its neighbors―do not even involve an attack on the United States itself.
机译:3月初,当新的《核态势评估》(NPR)的真实内容被披露时,布什政府的正式回应与文件本身一样令人困惑和适得其反。 2002年1月的审查明确引用了伊拉克,伊朗,利比亚,朝鲜和叙利亚-除了中国和俄罗斯-称存在多种“即时”和潜在的意外情况,可能需要对他们使用核武器。审查的许多“方案”甚至都没有涉及这些国家使用核武器的情况。评论的三个最突出的情况中的两个-中国对台湾的进攻和伊拉克对以色列或其邻国的进攻-甚至没有涉及对美国本身的进攻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号