首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America >Focal Depth Determination for Moderate and Small Earthquakes by Modeling Regional Depth Phases sPg, sPmP, and sPn
【24h】

Focal Depth Determination for Moderate and Small Earthquakes by Modeling Regional Depth Phases sPg, sPmP, and sPn

机译:通过对区域深度阶段sPg,sPmP和sPn建模,确定中小地震的震源深度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There are three usable regional depth phases, sPg, sPmP, and sPn, and their corresponding reference phases, Pg, PmP, and Pn. The differential time between each depth phase and its reference phase can be used to estimate earthquake focal depth. We have developed a method to determine focal depth for moderate and small earthquakes by using a regional depth-phase modeling (RDPM) method. We used a default focal mechanism to generate the differential times for all earthquakes. To estimate the reliability of the modeled focal depths, we compared our solutions with those obtained by other methods and found the consistency is good. Because the focal depths estimated by RDPM are model dependent, we tested the extent of the dependency and found that a 10% error in the crustal model may generate a 10%–15% error in the modeled depth. The absolute error is determined by the error in the crustal model and the focal depth itself. We found that earthquake location errors have only a small effect on the modeled focal depths. By analyzing synthetic and observed waveforms, we found a distance window within which sPmP and PmP are well developed, and, within the window, the P portion of the waveform is relatively simple and sPmP and PmP are easy to identify. We also demonstrated that the assumptions of sPmP and PmP are correct, that regional depth phases are not developed or not discernible in some regions, and that regional depth phases have special features that can be used to identify those phases.
机译:共有三个可用的区域深度阶段sPg,sPmP和 sPn,以及它们相应的参考阶段Pg,PmP和 Pn。每个深度阶段与其参考 阶段之间的时差可用于估计地震震源深度。我们已经开发了一种使用区域深度相位建模(RDPM) 方法确定中度和 小地震震源深度的方法。我们使用默认的震源机制为所有地震生成差分 时间。为了估计 建模焦深的可靠性,我们将我们的解决方案与通过其他方法获得的 的解决方案进行了比较,发现一致性很好。因为 RDPM估计的焦深与模型有关,所以我们测试了 依赖性的程度,发现 地壳模型中有10%的误差可能会在模拟的 深度中产生10%–15%的误差。绝对误差由 地壳模型中的误差以及焦点深度本身确定。我们发现,地震 位置误差对模拟的震源 深度只有很小的影响。通过分析合成波形和观察到的波形,我们发现 一个距离窗口,其中sPmP和PmP很好地发展了, ,并且在该窗口内,波形的P部分相对< sup> simple和sPmP和PmP易于识别。我们还证明了 的sPmP和PmP假设是正确的,在某些地区 深度阶段没有发展或无法辨别, 区域深度阶段具有特殊的功能,可以使用 来识别那些阶段。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America》 |2010年第3期|1073-1088|共16页
  • 作者

    Shutian Ma;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario N6A 5B7 Canada shutian33@yahoo.ca;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号