首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of economic research >PREDICTING STOCK RETURNS AND VOLATILITY WITH INVESTOR SENTIMENT INDICES: A RECONSIDERATION USING A NONPARAMETRIC CAUSALITY-IN-QUANTILES TEST
【24h】

PREDICTING STOCK RETURNS AND VOLATILITY WITH INVESTOR SENTIMENT INDICES: A RECONSIDERATION USING A NONPARAMETRIC CAUSALITY-IN-QUANTILES TEST

机译:使用投资者情感指数预测库存收益和波动性:使用非参数因果关系式四分之一检验的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Evidence of monthly stock returns predictability based on popular investor sentiment indices, namely S-BW and S-PLS as introduced by Baker and Wurgler (2006, 2007) and Huang etal. (2015) respectively are mixed. While, linear predictive models show that only S-PLS can predict excess stock returns, nonparametric models (which accounts for misspecification of the linear frameworks due to nonlinearity and regime changes) finds no evidence of predictability based on either of these two indices for not only stock returns, but also its volatility. However, in this paper, we show that when we use a more general nonparametric causality-in-quantiles model of Balcilar etal., (forthcoming), in fact, both S-BW and S-PLS can predict stock returns and its volatility, with S-PLS being a relatively stronger predictor of excess returns during bear and bull regimes, and S-BW being a relatively powerful predictor of volatility of excess stock returns, barring the median of the conditional distribution.
机译:Baker和Wurgler(2006,2007)以及Huang等人提出的基于受欢迎的投资者情绪指数(即S-BW和S-PLS)的月度股票收益可预测性的证据。 (2015)分别好坏参半。虽然线性预测模型表明只有S-PLS才能预测超额股票收益,但非参数模型(这说明了由于非线性和制度变化导致线性框架的错误指定)无法根据这两个指数中的任何一个找到可预测性的证据,不仅股票收益,但也要波动。但是,在本文中,我们表明,当我们使用Balcilar等人的更一般的非参数因果关系模型(即将推出)时,实际上,S-BW和S-PLS都可以预测股票收益及其波动, S-PLS是熊市和牛市期间相对较高的超额收益预测指标,而S-BW是相对较高的超额股票收益波动率预测指标,但条件分布的中位数除外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号